University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):485-97. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4baa0.
The Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) is a measure of self-care defined as a naturalistic decision-making process involving the choice of behaviors that maintain physiological stability (maintenance) and the response to symptoms when they occur (management). In the 5 years since the SCHFI was published, we have added items, refined the response format of the maintenance scale and the SCHFI scoring procedure, and modified our advice about how to use the scores.
The objective of this article was to update users on these changes.
In this article, we address 8 specific questions about reliability, item difficulty, frequency of administration, learning effects, social desirability, validity, judgments of self-care adequacy, clinically relevant change, and comparability of the various versions.
The addition of items to the self-care maintenance scale did not significantly change the coefficient alpha, providing evidence that the structure of the instrument is more powerful than the individual items. No learning effect is associated with repeated administration. Social desirability is minimal. More evidence is provided of the validity of the SCHFI. A score of 70 or greater can be used as the cut-point to judge self-care adequacy, although evidence is provided that benefit occurs at even lower levels of self-care. A change in a scale score more than one-half of an SD is considered clinically relevant. Because of the standardized scores, results obtained with prior versions can be compared with those from later versions.
The SCHFI v.6 is ready to be used by investigators. By publication in this format, we are putting the instrument in the public domain; permission is not required to use the SCHFI.
心力衰竭自我护理指数(SCHFI)是一种自我护理的衡量标准,定义为一种自然决策过程,涉及选择维持生理稳定的行为(维持)和对出现症状时的反应(管理)。自 SCHFI 发表以来的 5 年中,我们增加了项目,改进了维持量表和 SCHFI 评分程序的反应格式,并修改了我们关于如何使用评分的建议。
本文旨在向用户介绍这些变化。
在本文中,我们针对可靠性、项目难度、管理频率、学习效果、社会期望、有效性、自我护理充足性判断、临床相关变化以及各种版本的可比性这 8 个具体问题进行了讨论。
在维持量表中添加项目并没有显著改变系数 alpha,这表明该仪器的结构比个别项目更强大。重复管理没有学习效应。社会期望很小。提供了更多关于 SCHFI 有效性的证据。得分 70 或更高可以用作判断自我护理充足性的临界点,尽管有证据表明,即使在较低的自我护理水平也会带来益处。量表评分变化超过一个标准差的一半被认为具有临床相关性。由于采用了标准化分数,因此可以将以前版本的结果与以后版本的结果进行比较。
SCHFI v.6 已准备好供研究人员使用。通过这种格式的发表,我们将仪器置于公共领域;使用 SCHFI 无需获得许可。