• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CNS 7056、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对绵羊镇静特性的比较。

Comparison of the sedative properties of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol in sheep.

作者信息

Upton R N, Martinez A M, Grant C

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):848-57. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep269. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aep269
PMID:19797247
Abstract

BACKGROUND

CNS 7056 is an esterase-metabolized benzodiazepine sedative currently under development. Its short duration of action would suggest a clinical role similar to midazolam or propofol.

METHODS

The effect of a range of doses of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol on depth of sedation, the respiratory system, and the cardiovascular system was studied in chronically instrumented sheep (n=5 or 6). The low, medium, and high doses of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol were 0.37, 0.74, and 1.47 mg kg(-1); 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg kg(-1); and 1, 2, and 4 mg kg(-1), respectively.

RESULTS

CNS 7056 produced substantial sedation with rapid onset and offset for all doses, with duration rather than depth of sedation increasing with the dose. The lower doses of midazolam had minimal sedative effect; increasing the dose produced variable but longer term sedation. Sedation from propofol was comparable with that of CNS 7056 for the medium and high doses only. The high doses produced approximately 20 min of sedation. All three drugs produced dose-dependent respiratory (e.g. reductions in arterial oxygen tension) and cardiovascular depression (e.g. reductions in mean arterial pressure). For CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol, the magnitude of the cardiovascular and respiratory depression was proportional to the depth of sedation achieved for any given drug or dose. For all three drugs, the respiratory and cardiovascular depression was not of sufficient magnitude to endanger the animals.

CONCLUSIONS

CNS 7056 is a powerful and short-acting anaesthetic in sheep with respiratory and cardiovascular effects consistent with its sedative/anaesthetic qualities.

摘要

背景

CNS 7056是一种正在研发的经酯酶代谢的苯二氮䓬类镇静剂。其作用持续时间短,表明其临床作用类似于咪达唑仑或丙泊酚。

方法

在长期植入监测设备的绵羊(n = 5或6)中,研究了一系列剂量的CNS 7056、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对镇静深度、呼吸系统和心血管系统的影响。CNS 7056、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚的低、中、高剂量分别为0.37、0.74和1.47 mg·kg⁻¹;0.05、0.1和0.2 mg·kg⁻¹;以及1、2和4 mg·kg⁻¹。

结果

CNS 7056在所有剂量下均能产生显著的镇静作用,起效快且作用消失快,镇静持续时间而非深度随剂量增加而延长。较低剂量的咪达唑仑镇静作用极小;增加剂量会产生可变但更持久的镇静作用。丙泊酚仅在中、高剂量时的镇静作用与CNS 7056相当。高剂量可产生约20分钟的镇静作用。所有三种药物均产生剂量依赖性的呼吸抑制(如动脉血氧张力降低)和心血管抑制(如平均动脉压降低)。对于CNS 7056、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚,心血管和呼吸抑制的程度与任何给定药物或剂量所达到的镇静深度成正比。对于所有三种药物,呼吸和心血管抑制的程度均不足以危及动物生命。

结论

CNS 7056在绵羊中是一种强效短效麻醉剂,其对呼吸和心血管系统的影响与其镇静/麻醉特性一致。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the sedative properties of CNS 7056, midazolam, and propofol in sheep.CNS 7056、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对绵羊镇静特性的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):848-57. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep269. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
2
Cardiovascular effects of epinephrine under sedation with nitrous oxide, propofol, or midazolam.一氧化二氮、丙泊酚或咪达唑仑镇静下肾上腺素对心血管系统的影响。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
3
Impact of concurrent remifentanil on the sedative effects of remimazolam, midazolam and propofol in cynomolgus monkeys.氯雷他定对猕猴咪达唑仑、依托咪酯和丙泊酚镇静效果的影响。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 5;890:173639. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173639. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Propofol versus midazolam for sedation during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.异丙酚与咪达唑仑用于经皮腔内血管成形术镇静的比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996 Sep-Oct;7(5):673-80. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)70827-8.
5
A dose escalation study in sheep of the effects of the benzodiazepine CNS 7056 on sedation, the EEG and the respiratory and cardiovascular systems.一项关于苯二氮䓬类药物CNS 7056对绵羊镇静作用、脑电图以及呼吸和心血管系统影响的剂量递增研究。
Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Sep;155(1):52-61. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.228. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
6
Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol.结肠镜检查镇静后早期认知功能障碍:丙泊酚中添加咪达唑仑和/或芬太尼的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1448-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a6ad31. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
7
Comparison of the effect of protocol-directed sedation with propofol vs. midazolam by nurses in intensive care: efficacy, haemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction.重症监护病房护士使用丙泊酚与咪达唑仑进行方案导向镇静的效果比较:疗效、血流动力学稳定性及患者满意度
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1510-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02128.x.
8
Age effect on efficacy and side effects of two sedation and analgesia protocols on patients going through cardioversion: a randomized clinical trial.年龄对两种镇静镇痛方案用于心脏复律患者时疗效及副作用的影响:一项随机临床试验
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 May;13(5):493-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.013. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
9
Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol versus midazolam and propofol, titrated to moderate sedation, for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.非麻醉医师管理的异丙酚与咪达唑仑和异丙酚,滴定至中度镇静,用于结肠镜检查:一项随机对照试验。
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Sep;57(9):2385-93. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2222-4. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy.瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚用于清醒镇痛/镇静与芬太尼、咪达唑仑和丙泊酚用于门诊结肠镜检查全凭静脉麻醉的比较
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 May;57(6):657-63. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.207.

引用本文的文献

1
Remimazolam attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced behavioral deficits and neuronal injury via activation of the Nrf2 pathway.瑞马唑仑通过激活Nrf2信号通路减轻脂多糖诱导的行为缺陷和神经元损伤。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 21;15(1):13784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95379-y.
2
Comparison of remimazolam tosylate and propofol in hemodynamic stability, postoperative cognitive function, and recovery in general anesthesia combined with regional nerve blocks: a retrospective cohort study.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在全身麻醉联合区域神经阻滞时血流动力学稳定性、术后认知功能及恢复情况的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02981-8.
3
Remimazolam for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review.
瑞马唑仑用于胃肠内镜检查镇静的综合综述。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):385-395. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.385.
4
The effects of remimazolam combined with sufentanil on respiration, circulation and sedation level in patients undergoing colonoscopy.瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼对结肠镜检查患者呼吸、循环及镇静水平的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02644-0.
5
An ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine in thalamic nucleus reuniens undermines fear extinction via intermediation of hippocamposeptal circuits.丘脑后联合核中的超短效苯二氮䓬类药物通过海马隔区回路的中介作用破坏恐惧消退。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jun 14;7(1):728. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06417-w.
6
Validation of the anesthetic effect of a mixture of remimazolam, medetomidine, and butorphanol in three mouse strains.验证雷米唑仑、甲磺酸右美托咪定和丁丙诺啡混合物在三种小鼠品系中的麻醉效果。
Exp Anim. 2024 May 3;73(2):223-232. doi: 10.1538/expanim.23-0158. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
7
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol in patients undergoing day surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于日间手术患者的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 26;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02092-2.
8
Effect of remimazolam versus propofol for the induction of general anesthesia on cerebral blood flow and oxygen saturation in elderly patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于行颈动脉内膜切除术老年患者全麻诱导对脑血流和氧饱和度的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 4;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02095-z.
9
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.甲磺酸雷米佐旦用于上消化道内镜检查镇静的疗效和安全性:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):995. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06935-0.
10
Remimazolam Requires Less Vasopressor Support during Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center.瑞马唑仑在经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者全麻诱导和维持中对血管加压药的需求较少:单中心回顾性分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 22;2022:6386606. doi: 10.1155/2022/6386606. eCollection 2022.