Pastor Luis Miguel
Departamento de Biología Celular e Histología. Universidad de Murcia. Campus de Espinardo, España.
Cuad Bioet. 2011 May-Aug;22(75):141-50.
In this brief article we continue our reflection about the relations that should exist between the knowledge of biomedical sciences and the development of bioethics. After stating the principle of not absolute concordance between empirical and philosophical data as well as the former data are partial truths and highly contextualized by the experiment, we propose a certain criteria that should govern the use of biomedical sciences in bioethics. These criteria are based on ability to distinguish the two areas of knowledge and, without confusing each other, achieve their integration in a new unit of knowledge. Approximating the two disciplines in this way each will be more able to accommodate the other. From contiguity to integration into a higher order unit, without that both losing their own nature. We conclude that not only this posture avoid the mistake of deducting the bioethics from experimental scientific date but also not to manipulate biomedical data based on previous philosophical positions. Furthermore we also reached a more comprehensive and real understanding of bioethics. This implies that both scientists and humanists that work in bioethics must live an ethical imperative in their research that we have described as essential. This consist in a continuously update in biomedicine for research and development the bioethics.
在这篇简短的文章中，我们继续思考生物医学科学知识与生物伦理学发展之间应存在的关系。在阐述了经验数据与哲学数据并非绝对一致的原则，以及前者是部分真理且高度依赖实验背景之后，我们提出了一些应指导生物伦理学中生物医学科学应用的标准。这些标准基于区分这两个知识领域的能力，且在不相互混淆的情况下，将它们整合到一个新的知识单元中。以这种方式使这两个学科相互接近，它们将更有能力相互容纳。从相邻到整合为一个更高层次的单元，而不会使两者失去自身性质。我们得出结论，这种立场不仅避免了从实验科学数据中推导生物伦理学的错误，也避免了基于先前哲学立场操纵生物医学数据的错误。此外，我们还对生物伦理学有了更全面、更真实的理解。这意味着从事生物伦理学研究的科学家和人文主义者在其研究中都必须遵循一种我们认为至关重要的道德要求。这包括在生物医学方面不断更新，以促进生物伦理学的研究与发展。
