Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Crit Care. 2009;13(5):R157. doi: 10.1186/cc8114. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
Despite the key role of hemodynamic goals, there are few data addressing the question as to which hemodynamic variables are associated with outcome or should be targeted in cardiogenic shock patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between hemodynamic variables and cardiogenic shock mortality.
Medical records and the patient data management system of a multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) were reviewed for patients admitted because of cardiogenic shock. In all patients, the hourly variable time integral of hemodynamic variables during the first 24 hours after ICU admission was calculated. If hemodynamic variables were associated with 28-day mortality, the hourly variable time integral of drops below clinically relevant threshold levels was computed. Regression models and receiver operator characteristic analyses were calculated. All statistical models were adjusted for age, admission year, mean catecholamine doses and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (excluding hemodynamic counts) in order to account for the influence of age, changes in therapies during the observation period, the severity of cardiovascular failure and the severity of the underlying disease on 28-day mortality.
One-hundred and nineteen patients were included. Cardiac index (CI) (P = 0.01) and cardiac power index (CPI) (P = 0.03) were the only hemodynamic variables separately associated with mortality. The hourly time integral of CI drops <3, 2.75 (both P = 0.02) and 2.5 (P = 0.03) L/min/m2 was associated with death but not that of CI drops <2 L/min/m2 or lower thresholds (all P > 0.05). The hourly time integral of CPI drops <0.5-0.8 W/m2 (all P = 0.04) was associated with 28-day mortality but not that of CPI drops <0.4 W/m2 or lower thresholds (all P > 0.05).
During the first 24 hours after intensive care unit admission, CI and CPI are the most important hemodynamic variables separately associated with 28-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. A CI of 3 L/min/m2 and a CPI of 0.8 W/m2 were most predictive of 28-day mortality. Since our results must be considered hypothesis-generating, randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate whether targeting these levels as early resuscitation endpoints can improve mortality in cardiogenic shock.
尽管血流动力学目标起着关键作用,但关于哪些血流动力学变量与心源性休克患者的预后相关或应该作为治疗靶点,目前的数据仍较少。本研究旨在探讨血流动力学变量与心源性休克患者死亡率之间的关系。
回顾性分析了因心源性休克入住多学科重症监护病房(ICU)患者的病历和患者数据管理系统。对所有患者,计算了 ICU 入院后 24 小时内每小时血流动力学变量的时间积分。如果血流动力学变量与 28 天死亡率相关,则计算低于临床相关阈值水平的每小时变量时间积分下降量。计算回归模型和受试者工作特征分析。为了考虑年龄、治疗期间的变化、心血管衰竭的严重程度和基础疾病的严重程度对 28 天死亡率的影响,所有统计模型均进行了年龄、入院年份、平均儿茶酚胺剂量和简化急性生理学评分 II(不包括血流动力学计数)的调整。
共纳入 119 例患者。心指数(CI)(P = 0.01)和心功率指数(CPI)(P = 0.03)是与死亡率单独相关的唯一血流动力学变量。CI 下降<3、2.75(均 P = 0.02)和 2.5 L/min/m2(均 P = 0.03)的每小时时间积分与死亡相关,但 CI 下降<2 L/min/m2 或更低阈值则无关(均 P > 0.05)。CPI 下降<0.5-0.8 W/m2(均 P = 0.04)的每小时时间积分与 28 天死亡率相关,但 CPI 下降<0.4 W/m2 或更低阈值则无关(均 P > 0.05)。
在入住 ICU 后 24 小时内,CI 和 CPI 是与心源性休克患者 28 天死亡率单独相关的最重要的血流动力学变量。CI 为 3 L/min/m2 和 CPI 为 0.8 W/m2 对 28 天死亡率最具预测性。由于我们的结果必须被视为产生假说,因此需要进行随机对照试验来评估将这些水平作为早期复苏终点是否可以改善心源性休克患者的死亡率。