• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

臂丛神经损伤患者的功能能力。

Functional capacity of individuals with brachial plexus injury.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Work. 2023;76(3):1019-1030. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220414.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-220414
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To enable (pain free) functioning, individuals with brachial plexus injury (BPI) may require a higher functional capacity compared to two-handed individuals, because the load on unaffected structures is greater.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the functional capacity of individuals with BPI and healthy controls and explored differences in the functional capacity of BPI-affected individuals with respect to: those with and without hand function; affected and unaffected sides; with and without musculoskeletal complaints (MSCs).

METHODS

Six functional capacity tests adjusted for one-handed function were performed by 23 BPI-affected individuals and 20 healthy controls. Hand function was assessed through physical examination and the Dutch Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was used to assess MSCs.

RESULTS

Individuals with BPI scored lower for the two-handed tests, compared with the controls (p≤0.01, effect size (r) ≤-0.41 for both tests). However, both groups performed similar in the one-handed tests. On average individuals with BPI met the physical demands to perform sedentary to light physical work. Among BPI-affected individuals, two-handed overhead lifting capacity was higher in those with hand function than in those without hand function (p = 0.02; r = 0.33). Functional capacity tended to be lower for the unaffected side than for the affected side (4 tests; p≤0.05, r≤-0.36). Test results of BPI-affected Individuals with and without MSCs were similar.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with BPI demonstrated lower two-handed functional capacity than healthy controls. Effect sizes were medium. Capacity of their unaffected side was similar to the dominant side of controls. No association was found between MSCs and functional capacity.

摘要

背景

为了实现(无痛)功能,臂丛神经损伤(BPI)患者可能需要比双手健全的个体更高的功能能力,因为未受损结构的负荷更大。

目的

本研究比较了 BPI 患者和健康对照者的功能能力,并探讨了 BPI 患者的功能能力在以下方面的差异:有手功能和无手功能的个体;受影响和未受影响的侧;有和无肌肉骨骼抱怨(MSCs)的个体。

方法

23 名 BPI 患者和 20 名健康对照者进行了 6 项适应单手功能的功能能力测试。通过体格检查评估手功能,使用荷兰肌肉骨骼问卷评估 MSCs。

结果

与对照组相比,BPI 患者在双手测试中的得分较低(p≤0.01,两项测试的效应大小(r)均≤-0.41)。然而,两组在单手测试中的表现相似。BPI 患者平均能够满足进行久坐或轻度体力工作的身体需求。在 BPI 患者中,有手功能的患者比无手功能的患者双手头顶举重物能力更高(p=0.02;r=0.33)。未受影响侧的功能能力比受影响侧的功能能力低(4 项测试;p≤0.05,r≤-0.36)。有和无 MSCs 的 BPI 患者的测试结果相似。

结论

与健康对照者相比,BPI 患者的双手功能能力较低。效应大小为中等。他们未受影响侧的能力与对照组的优势侧相似。未发现 MSCs 与功能能力之间存在关联。

相似文献

1
Functional capacity of individuals with brachial plexus injury.臂丛神经损伤患者的功能能力。
Work. 2023;76(3):1019-1030. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220414.
2
Musculoskeletal complaints, physical work demands, and functional capacity in individuals with a brachial plexus injury: An exploratory study.臂丛神经损伤患者的肌肉骨骼投诉、体力工作需求和功能能力:一项探索性研究。
Work. 2024;77(3):811-825. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220680.
3
Prevalence and factors associated with musculoskeletal complaints and disability in individuals with brachial plexus injury: a cross-sectional study.臂丛神经损伤患者的肌肉骨骼投诉和残疾的患病率及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Sep;45(18):2936-2945. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2117426. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Upper Limb Reduction Deficiency and Amputation: Development and Pilot Testing.上肢部分缺失和截肢患者的功能能力评估:制定和初步测试。
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):158-169. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9703-4.
5
Validity and Reliability of Prognosis Brachial Plexus Injury Score for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury.预后臂丛神经损伤评分对创伤性臂丛神经损伤的有效性和可靠性。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(1):153-158. doi: 10.4055/cios22168. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
6
Effective long-term management of brachial plexus injury following surgery: What is needed from hand therapists' perspectives.术后臂丛神经损伤的有效长期管理:从手部治疗师的角度来看需要什么。
J Hand Ther. 2022 Apr-Jun;35(2):267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
7
Clinimetric evaluation of questionnaires used to assess activity after traumatic brachial plexus injury in adults: a systematic review.问卷在评估成人创伤性臂丛神经损伤后活动能力中的临床计量学评价:系统综述。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2082-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.188.
8
Evaluation of Internal Construct Validity and Unidimensionality of the Brachial Assessment Tool, A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Brachial Plexus Injury.臂丛神经损伤患者报告结局测量工具——臂丛评估工具的内部结构效度及单维度性评估
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Dec;97(12):2146-2156. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
9
Psychometric Evaluation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Questionnaire for Brachial Plexus Injury Using Rasch Analysis.使用 Rasch 分析对臂丛神经损伤的上肢、肩部和手功能障碍问卷进行心理计量学评估。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Apr;27(2):285-293. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500230. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
10
Brain functional network abnormality extends beyond the sensorimotor network in brachial plexus injury patients.臂丛神经损伤患者的脑功能网络异常超出了感觉运动网络。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Dec;10(4):1198-1205. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9484-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Musculoskeletal complaints, physical work demands, and functional capacity in individuals with a brachial plexus injury: An exploratory study.臂丛神经损伤患者的肌肉骨骼投诉、体力工作需求和功能能力:一项探索性研究。
Work. 2024;77(3):811-825. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220680.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and factors associated with musculoskeletal complaints and disability in individuals with brachial plexus injury: a cross-sectional study.臂丛神经损伤患者的肌肉骨骼投诉和残疾的患病率及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Sep;45(18):2936-2945. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2117426. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes following nerve transfer surgery for brachial plexus injury.臂丛神经损伤神经转移术后患者报告结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PM R. 2022 Nov;14(11):1368-1381. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12778. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Predictive factors for return to work or study and satisfaction in traumatic brachial plexus injury individuals undergoing rehabilitation: A retrospective follow-up study of 101 cases.
创伤性臂丛神经损伤患者康复后重返工作或学习及满意度的预测因素:101 例回顾性随访研究。
J Hand Ther. 2023 Jan-Mar;36(1):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test and the Thumb Localizing Test in Patients With Stroke.Semmes-Weinstein单丝试验和拇指定位试验在脑卒中患者中的效度和信度
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 27;11:625917. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.625917. eCollection 2020.
5
Quality of life of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries.创伤性臂丛神经损伤患者的生活质量。
Injury. 2021 Apr;52(4):855-861. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.074. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
6
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Different Societal Contexts: Results of a Multicountry Study.不同社会环境下的功能能力评估:一项多国研究的结果。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(1):222-236. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9782-x.
7
Participation restrictions among adolescents and adults with neonatal brachial plexus palsy: the patient perspective.新生儿臂丛神经麻痹青少年及成人患者的参与限制:患者视角
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(26):3147-3155. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1380717. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
8
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Upper Limb Reduction Deficiency and Amputation: Development and Pilot Testing.上肢部分缺失和截肢患者的功能能力评估:制定和初步测试。
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):158-169. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9703-4.
9
Compensation by the Uninjured Arm After Brachial Plexus Injury.臂丛神经损伤后健侧上肢的代偿
Hand (N Y). 2016 Dec;11(4):410-415. doi: 10.1177/1558944715627635. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
High prevalence of neuropathic pain in the hand of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury: a cross-sectional study.创伤性臂丛神经损伤患者手部神经性疼痛的高患病率:一项横断面研究。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2016 Nov;74(11):895-901. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20160149.