Cody June D, Richardson Karen, Moehrer Birgit, Hextall Andrew, Glazener Cathryn Ma
Cochrane Incontinence Review Group, University of Aberdeen, 1st Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD001405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001405.pub2.
It is possible that oestrogen deficiency may be an aetiological factor in the development of urinary incontinence in women.
To assess the effects of local and systemic oestrogens used for the treatment of urinary incontinence.
We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register of trials (2 April 2009) and the reference lists of relevant articles.
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that included oestrogens in at least one arm, in women with symptomatic or urodynamic diagnoses of stress, urgency or mixed urinary incontinence or other urinary symptoms post-menopause.
Trials were evaluated for methodological quality and appropriateness for inclusion by the review authors. Data were extracted by at least two authors and cross checked. Subgroup analyses were performed grouping participants under local or systemic administration. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was undertaken.
Thirty- three trials were identified which included 19,313 (1,262 involved in trials of local administration) incontinent women of whom 9417 received oestrogen therapy. Sample sizes ranged from 16 to 16,117. The trials used varying combinations of type of oestrogen, dose, duration of treatment and length of follow up. Outcome data were not reported consistently and were available for only a minority of outcomes.Systemic administration (of oral oestrogens) resulted in worse incontinence than on placebo (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.48). This result is heavily weighted by a subgroup of women from the Hendrix trial, which had large numbers of participants and a longer follow up of one year; all the women had had a hysterectomy and the treatment used was conjugated equine oestrogen. The result for women with an intact uterus where oestrogen and progestogen combined were used also showed a statistically significant worsening of incontinence (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.18).There was some evidence that oestrogens used locally (for example vaginal creams or tablets) may improve incontinence (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.86). Overall, there were around one to two fewer voids in 24 hours and nocturnal voids amongst women treated with local oestrogen, and there was less frequency and urgency. No serious adverse events were reported although some women experienced vaginal spotting, breast tenderness or nausea.Women who were continent and received systemic oestrogen replacement, with or without progestogens, for reasons other than urinary incontinence were more likely to report the development of new urinary incontinence in one large study.The data were too few to address questions about oestrogens compared with or in combination with other treatments, different types of oestrogen or different modes of delivery.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Local oestrogen treatment for incontinence may improve or cure it, but there was little evidence from the trials on the period after oestrogen treatment had finished and none about long-term effects. However, systemic hormone replacement therapy, using conjugated equine oestrogen, may make incontinence worse. There were too few data to reliably address other aspects of oestrogen therapy, such as oestrogen type and dose, and no direct evidence on route of administration. The risk of endometrial and breast cancer after long-term use suggests that oestrogen treatment should be for limited periods, especially in those women with an intact uterus.
雌激素缺乏可能是女性尿失禁发病的一个病因。
评估局部和全身使用雌激素治疗尿失禁的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane尿失禁组专业试验注册库(2009年4月2日)以及相关文章的参考文献列表。
随机或半随机对照试验,至少一组使用雌激素,受试女性有压力性、急迫性或混合性尿失禁的症状诊断或尿动力学诊断,或绝经后有其他泌尿系统症状。
综述作者评估试验的方法学质量及纳入的合理性。数据由至少两名作者提取并交叉核对。进行亚组分析,将参与者按局部或全身给药分组。适当情况下,进行荟萃分析。
共识别出33项试验,包括19313名尿失禁女性(1262名参与局部给药试验),其中9417名接受雌激素治疗。样本量从16至16117不等。试验中雌激素类型、剂量、治疗持续时间和随访时长的组合各不相同。结局数据报告不一致,仅少数结局有可用数据。全身给药(口服雌激素)导致的尿失禁情况比安慰剂更差(风险比1.32,95%可信区间1.17至1.48)。这一结果在很大程度上受Hendrix试验中一个亚组女性的影响,该亚组参与者众多,随访长达一年;所有女性均已行子宫切除术,使用的治疗药物为结合马雌激素。对于子宫完整且联合使用雌激素和孕激素的女性,结果也显示尿失禁在统计学上有显著恶化(风险比1.11,95%可信区间1.04至1.18)。有一些证据表明局部使用雌激素(如阴道乳膏或片剂)可能改善尿失禁(风险比0.74,95%可信区间0.64至0.86)。总体而言,局部使用雌激素治疗的女性24小时排尿次数和夜间排尿次数减少约一至两次,尿频和尿急症状减轻。虽未报告严重不良事件,但一些女性出现阴道点滴出血、乳房压痛或恶心。在一项大型研究中,因非尿失禁原因接受全身雌激素替代治疗(无论是否联合孕激素)的无尿失禁女性更有可能报告出现新的尿失禁。数据过少,无法解答与其他治疗方法相比或联合使用时雌激素的问题、不同类型雌激素的问题或不同给药方式的问题。
局部使用雌激素治疗尿失禁可能改善或治愈尿失禁,但试验几乎未提供雌激素治疗结束后时期的证据,也没有关于长期效果的证据。然而,使用结合马雌激素的全身激素替代疗法可能使尿失禁加重。数据过少,无法可靠解答雌激素治疗的其他方面问题,如雌激素类型和剂量,也没有关于给药途径的直接证据。长期使用后子宫内膜癌和乳腺癌的风险表明,雌激素治疗应在有限期限内进行,尤其是对于子宫完整的女性。