Jaeckle Kurt A, Ballman Karla, Furth Alfred, Buckner Jan C
Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Neurology. 2009 Oct 13;73(15):1207-13. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bbfeca.
Clinical trials involving patients with glioblastoma (GBM) distinguish cohorts who are treated with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC). Such anticonvulsants induce hepatic P450 microsomal enzymes, which accelerate the metabolism of certain chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents. However, the resultant effect of such induction on patient outcome has received limited study.
We performed a correlative analysis of baseline EIAC use with outcome, using a cross-sectional database of 620 patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated prospectively on North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials.
At registration, 72% were receiving treatment with EIAC; 2% were receiving non-EIACs, and the 26% were not receiving anticonvulsants (26%). Surprisingly, in the multivariable Cox model, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) showed a positive correlation with EIAC use (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, p = 0.0028 and HR = 0.80, p = 0.022), even after adjustment for the known prognostic factors of age, performance status, extent of resection, steroid use, and baseline neurocognitive function. Specifically, the median OS was longer in EIAC compared with non-EIAC patients (12.3 vs 10.7 months, p = 0.0002). Similarly, PFS was longer in EIAC patients (5.6 vs 4.8 months, p = 0.003). No differences in median OS or PFS were observed when comparing patients with or without a history of seizures at baseline.
Paradoxically, enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant (EIAC) use correlated with superior outcome of patients with glioblastoma. These results suggest that in comparative clinical trials testing agents metabolized by P450 microsomal enzymes, treatment arms may need stratification for the proportion of patients receiving EIAC.
涉及胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的临床试验区分了接受酶诱导抗惊厥药(EIAC)治疗的队列。此类抗惊厥药可诱导肝P450微粒体酶,从而加速某些化疗药物和分子靶向药物的代谢。然而,这种诱导对患者预后的最终影响研究有限。
我们使用在北中部癌症治疗组试验中接受前瞻性治疗的620例新诊断GBM患者的横断面数据库,对基线EIAC使用情况与预后进行了相关性分析。
登记时,72%的患者接受EIAC治疗;2%的患者接受非EIAC治疗,26%的患者未接受抗惊厥药治疗。令人惊讶的是,在多变量Cox模型中,总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)与EIAC使用呈正相关(风险比[HR]=0.75,p=0.0028;HR=0.80,p=0.022),即使在对年龄、体能状态、切除范围、类固醇使用和基线神经认知功能等已知预后因素进行调整之后。具体而言,EIAC患者的中位OS较非EIAC患者更长(12.3个月对10.7个月,p=0.0002)。同样,EIAC患者的PFS更长(5.6个月对4.8个月,p=0.003)。比较基线时有或无癫痫病史的患者,未观察到中位OS或PFS有差异。
矛盾的是,酶诱导抗惊厥药(EIAC)的使用与胶质母细胞瘤患者的较好预后相关。这些结果表明,在测试由P450微粒体酶代谢的药物时,比较性临床试验的治疗组可能需要根据接受EIAC治疗的患者比例进行分层。