Rowland Susan
University of Greenwich, UK.
J Anal Psychol. 2009 Nov;54(5):697-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01814.x.
Zinkin's lucid challenge to Jung makes perfect sense. Indeed, it is the implications of this 'making sense' that this paper addresses. For Zinkin's characterization of the 'self' takes it as a 'concept' requiring coherence; a variety of abstract non-contextual knowledge that itself has a mythical heritage. Moreover, Zinkin's refinement of Jung seeks to make his work fit for the scientific paradigm of modernity. In turn, modernity's paradigm owes much to Newton's notion of knowledge via reductionism. Here knowledge or investigation is divided up into the smallest possible units with the aim of eventually putting it all together into 'one' picture of scientific truth. Unfortunately, 'reductionism' does not do justice to the resonant possibilities of Jung's writing. These look forward to a new scientific paradigm of the twenty-first century, of the interactive 'field', emergence and complexity theory. The paper works paradoxically by discovering Zinkin's 'intersubjective self' after all, in two undervalued narratives by Jung, his doctoral thesis and a short late ghost story. However, in the ambivalences and radical fictional experimentation of these fascinating texts can be discerned an-Other self, one both created and found.
津金对荣格清晰明了的质疑很有道理。事实上,本文探讨的正是这种“有道理”所带来的影响。因为津金对“自我”的描述将其视为一个需要连贯性的“概念”;是一种具有神话传承的抽象的非情境性知识。此外,津金对荣格的完善旨在使其作品符合现代性的科学范式。反过来,现代性的范式很大程度上归功于牛顿通过还原论的知识概念。在这里,知识或研究被分解为尽可能小的单位,目的是最终将其整合为一幅科学真理的“统一”图景。不幸的是,“还原论”并没有公正地对待荣格作品中那些富有共鸣的可能性。这些可能性指向了二十一世纪的一种新的科学范式,即互动的“场”、涌现和复杂性理论。本文自相矛盾地通过在荣格两篇被低估的叙述中,即他的博士论文和一篇晚期短篇小说中,最终发现了津金的“主体间自我”。然而,在这些引人入胜的文本的矛盾心理和激进的虚构实验中,可以辨别出另一种自我,一种既被创造又被发现的自我。