Castellano G A, Hazzard G T, Madden D L, Sever J L
J Infect Dis. 1977 Oct;136 Suppl:S337-40. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_2.s337.
Thirty samples of serum were tested for antibody to cytomegalovirus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect hemagglutination (IHA). The two tests were in extremely close agreement. Of the 30 sera evaluated by ELISA, 16 were considered to be positive and 14 were considered negative. In all 16 positive samples, the titers by ELISA were at least twofold to 10-fold higher than the indirect hemagglutination titers. Two of the 14 sera evaluated as negative by the ELISA test had low indirect hemagglutination titers (1:8 and 1:4). They were not detectable at the initial dilution (1:50) of the ELISA test. These two sera might have been classified as positive if the initial dilution in ELISA had been lower than 1:50.
通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和间接血凝试验(IHA)对30份血清样本进行巨细胞病毒抗体检测。两种检测方法的结果极为相近。在ELISA评估的30份血清中,16份被判定为阳性,14份为阴性。在所有16份阳性样本中,ELISA检测的滴度比间接血凝试验的滴度至少高两倍至十倍。ELISA检测判定为阴性的14份血清中有两份间接血凝试验滴度较低(1:8和1:4)。在ELISA检测的初始稀释度(1:50)下未检测到它们。如果ELISA检测的初始稀释度低于1:50,这两份血清可能会被判定为阳性。