Suppr超能文献

酶联免疫吸附试验与间接血凝试验检测巨细胞病毒抗体的比较。

Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the indirect hemagglutination test for detection of antibody to cytomegalovirus.

作者信息

Castellano G A, Hazzard G T, Madden D L, Sever J L

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 1977 Oct;136 Suppl:S337-40. doi: 10.1093/infdis/136.supplement_2.s337.

Abstract

Thirty samples of serum were tested for antibody to cytomegalovirus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect hemagglutination (IHA). The two tests were in extremely close agreement. Of the 30 sera evaluated by ELISA, 16 were considered to be positive and 14 were considered negative. In all 16 positive samples, the titers by ELISA were at least twofold to 10-fold higher than the indirect hemagglutination titers. Two of the 14 sera evaluated as negative by the ELISA test had low indirect hemagglutination titers (1:8 and 1:4). They were not detectable at the initial dilution (1:50) of the ELISA test. These two sera might have been classified as positive if the initial dilution in ELISA had been lower than 1:50.

摘要

通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和间接血凝试验(IHA)对30份血清样本进行巨细胞病毒抗体检测。两种检测方法的结果极为相近。在ELISA评估的30份血清中,16份被判定为阳性,14份为阴性。在所有16份阳性样本中,ELISA检测的滴度比间接血凝试验的滴度至少高两倍至十倍。ELISA检测判定为阴性的14份血清中有两份间接血凝试验滴度较低(1:8和1:4)。在ELISA检测的初始稀释度(1:50)下未检测到它们。如果ELISA检测的初始稀释度低于1:50,这两份血清可能会被判定为阳性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验