• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定类风湿关节炎患者维持疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗不变的低疾病活动阈值。

Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

机构信息

Centre hospitalier d'Aulnay sous Bois, Service de Rhumatologie, Boulevard Ballanger, Aulnay sous Bois F-93600, France.

出版信息

Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R157. doi: 10.1186/ar2836. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1186/ar2836
PMID:19849865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2787280/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine a low disease activity threshold--a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) value--for the decision to maintain unchanged disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients, based on expert opinion.

METHODS

Nine hundred and sixty-seven case scenarios with various levels for each component of the DAS28 (resulting in a disease activity score between 2 and 3.2) were presented to 44 panelists. For each scenario, panelists had to decide whether or not DMARD treatment (excluding steroids) could be maintained unchanged. In each scenario, for decision, the participants were given the DAS28 parameters, without knowledge of the resultant DAS28. The relationship between panelists' decision, DAS28 value, and components of the score were analysed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Each panelist analysed 160 randomised scenarios. Intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-four panelists participated in the study. Inter-panelist agreement was good (kappa = 0.63; 95% confidence interval = 0.61 to 0.65). Intra-panelist agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.82 to 0.92). Quasi-perfect agreement was observed for DAS28 < or = 2.4, less pronounced between 2.5 and 2.9, and almost no agreement for DAS28 > 3.0. For values below 2.5, panelists agreed to maintain unchanged DMARDs; for values above 2.5, discrepancies occurred more frequently as the DAS28 value increased. Multivariate analysis confirmed the relationship between panelist's decision, DAS28 value and components of the DAS28. Between DAS28 of 2.4 and 3.2, a major determinant for panelists' decision was swollen joint count. Female and public practice physicians decided more often to maintain treatment unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

As a conclusion, panelists suggested that in clinical practice there is no need to change DMARD treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients with DAS28 < or = 2.4.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在基于专家意见,确定低疾病活动阈值(DAS28 评分 28 关节),以便决定是否维持类风湿关节炎患者的疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗不变。

方法

向 44 名专家展示了 967 种不同 DAS28 各组成部分水平的病例情况(导致疾病活动评分在 2 到 3.2 之间)。对于每个病例,专家必须决定是否维持不变 DMARD 治疗(不包括类固醇)。在每个病例中,为了做出决策,参与者除了 DAS28 参数外,不了解由此产生的 DAS28。通过多元逻辑回归分析分析参与者决策、DAS28 值和评分组成部分之间的关系。每位专家分析了 160 个随机病例。评估了内部和外部评分者的可重复性。

结果

44 名专家参加了研究。专家之间的一致性良好(kappa = 0.63;95%置信区间为 0.61 至 0.65)。内部评分者的一致性极好(kappa = 0.87;95%置信区间为 0.82 至 0.92)。DAS28 <或= 2.4 时观察到几乎完全一致,DAS2.5 到 2.9 之间的一致性较差,DAS28 > 3.0 时几乎没有一致性。对于低于 2.5 的值,专家们同意维持不变的 DMARD;对于高于 2.5 的值,随着 DAS28 值的增加,差异出现的频率更高。多变量分析证实了专家决策、DAS28 值和 DAS28 组成部分之间的关系。在 DAS2.4 和 3.2 之间,专家决策的主要决定因素是肿胀关节计数。女性和公共实践医生更倾向于维持治疗不变。

结论

总之,专家们建议在临床实践中,DAS28 <或= 2.4 的类风湿关节炎患者无需改变 DMARD 治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9533/2787280/dac9bc1f930c/ar2836-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9533/2787280/75b04543b49d/ar2836-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9533/2787280/dac9bc1f930c/ar2836-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9533/2787280/75b04543b49d/ar2836-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9533/2787280/dac9bc1f930c/ar2836-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining a low disease activity threshold for decision to maintain disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment unchanged in rheumatoid arthritis patients.确定类风湿关节炎患者维持疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗不变的低疾病活动阈值。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R157. doi: 10.1186/ar2836. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
2
Identifying factors associated with concordance with the American College of Rheumatology rheumatoid arthritis treatment recommendations.确定与符合美国风湿病学会类风湿关节炎治疗建议相关的因素。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Apr 26;18:94. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0992-3.
3
Functional improvement after patients with rheumatoid arthritis start a new disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) associated with frequent changes in DMARD: the CORRONA database.类风湿关节炎患者开始使用与DMARD频繁变化相关的新型改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)后的功能改善:CORRONA数据库
J Rheumatol. 2008 Oct;35(10):1966-71. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
4
The gap between practice and guidelines in the choice of first-line disease modifying antirheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.早期类风湿关节炎一线改善病情抗风湿药物选择中实践与指南之间的差距:ESPOIR队列研究结果
J Rheumatol. 2009 May;36(5):934-42. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080762. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
5
Update of French society for rheumatology recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis.法国风湿病学会更新类风湿关节炎管理建议。
Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Mar;86(2):135-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Development and validation of a new disease activity score in 28 joints-based treatment response criterion for rheumatoid arthritis.基于 28 关节的治疗反应标准中类风湿关节炎新疾病活动评分的制定和验证。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Oct;65(10):1608-16. doi: 10.1002/acr.22037.
7
Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat to target strategy.紧张局势加剧?肌骨超声疾病活动评估对采用达标治疗策略治疗的早期类风湿关节炎患者的影响。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/acr.22218.
8
Which variables best predict change in rheumatoid arthritis therapy in daily clinical practice?在日常临床实践中,哪些变量最能预测类风湿性关节炎治疗的变化?
J Rheumatol. 2006 Jul;33(7):1243-6. Epub 2006 Apr 15.
9
Three out of four disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients meet 28-joint Disease Activity Score remission at 12 months: results from the FIN-ERA cohort.四分之三未使用改善病情抗风湿药物的类风湿关节炎患者在12个月时达到28个关节疾病活动评分缓解:芬兰类风湿关节炎队列研究结果
Scand J Rheumatol. 2017 Nov;46(6):425-431. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2016.1266029. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
10
Rheumatoid arthritis patients and rheumatologists approach the decision to escalate care differently: results of a maximum difference scaling experiment.类风湿关节炎患者和风湿病专家在决定升级治疗方案时的看法存在差异:最大差异标度实验的结果。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Oct;63(10):1407-14. doi: 10.1002/acr.20551.

本文引用的文献

1
Remission and rheumatoid arthritis: data on patients receiving usual care in twenty-four countries.缓解与类风湿关节炎:24个国家接受常规治疗患者的数据。
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep;58(9):2642-51. doi: 10.1002/art.23794.
2
Evaluating the adequacy of disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a RAND appropriateness panel.评估类风湿关节炎患者疾病控制的充分性:一个兰德适宜性专家小组。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Feb;47(2):194-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem326. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
3
Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2007.
《2007年关于治疗风湿性疾病生物制剂的更新共识声明》
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii2-22. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.081430.
4
A proposed continuous quality improvement approach to assessment and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis without formal joint counts, based on quantitative routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) scores on a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ).一种基于多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)上的患者指数数据定量常规评估(RAPID)评分,对无正式关节计数的类风湿关节炎患者进行评估和管理的拟议持续质量改进方法。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;21(4):789-804. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.009.
5
Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?类风湿关节炎综合评分的缓解:踝关节和足部重要吗?
Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(4):R72. doi: 10.1186/ar2270.
6
Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial).甲氨蝶呤强化治疗早期类风湿关节炎:旨在实现缓解。早期类风湿关节炎的计算机辅助管理(CAMERA,一项开放标签策略试验)。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66(11):1443-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.071092. Epub 2007 May 22.
7
Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders.风湿性疾病主观结局测量的最小临床重要改善及患者可接受症状状态
J Rheumatol. 2007 May;34(5):1188-93.
8
Evaluation of the preliminary definitions of minimal disease activity and remission in an early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis cohort.早期血清阳性类风湿关节炎队列中最小疾病活动度和缓解的初步定义评估
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr 15;57(3):440-7. doi: 10.1002/art.22619.
9
Clinical practice format for choosing a second-line disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis after failure of 6 months' first-line DMARD therapy.
Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Jan;74(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.05.008. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
10
Low disease activity state in rheumatoid arthritis: concepts and derivation of minimal disease activity.类风湿关节炎的低疾病活动状态:概念及最小疾病活动度的推导
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl 43):S-52-9.