Verstappen S M M, Jacobs J W G, van der Veen M J, Heurkens A H M, Schenk Y, ter Borg E J, Blaauw A A M, Bijlsma J W J
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Nov;66(11):1443-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.071092. Epub 2007 May 22.
To investigate whether intensive treatment with methotrexate (MTX) according to a strict protocol and a computerised decision program is more beneficial compared to conventional treatment with MTX in early rheumatoid arthritis.
In a two-year multicentre open label strategy trial, 299 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis were randomly assigned to the intensive strategy group or the conventional strategy group. Patients in both groups received MTX, the aim of treatment being remission. Patients in the intensive treatment group came to the outpatient clinic once every month; adjustment of the MTX dosage was tailored to the individual patient on the basis of predefined response criteria, using a computerised decision program. Patients of the conventional strategy group came to the outpatient clinic once every three months; they were treated according to common practice. Cyclosporine was added if patients had an inadequate response to maximal tolerated MTX doses.
Seventy six (50%) patients in the intensive strategy group achieved at least one period of remission during the two year trial, versus 55 patients (37%) in the conventional strategy group (p = 0.03). Areas under the curve for nearly all clinical variables were significantly lower-that is, there was a better clinical effect for the intensive treatment group compared with the conventional treatment group.
The results of this study show that it is possible to substantially enhance the clinical efficacy early in the course of the disease by intensifying treatment with MTX, aiming for remission, tailored to the individual patient. Furthermore, participating rheumatologists indicated that the computerised decision program could be a helpful tool in their daily clinical practice.
探讨在早期类风湿关节炎中,按照严格方案和计算机化决策程序进行甲氨蝶呤(MTX)强化治疗是否比MTX传统治疗更有益。
在一项为期两年的多中心开放标签策略试验中,299例早期类风湿关节炎患者被随机分配至强化策略组或传统策略组。两组患者均接受MTX治疗,治疗目标为病情缓解。强化治疗组患者每月到门诊就诊一次;根据预定义的反应标准,使用计算机化决策程序为个体患者调整MTX剂量。传统策略组患者每三个月到门诊就诊一次;他们按照常规方法进行治疗。如果患者对最大耐受剂量的MTX反应不足,则加用环孢素。
在两年的试验中,强化策略组有76例(50%)患者至少有一个缓解期,而传统策略组有55例(37%)患者达到缓解(p = 0.03)。几乎所有临床变量的曲线下面积均显著更低,即强化治疗组比传统治疗组有更好的临床效果。
本研究结果表明,在疾病早期通过强化MTX治疗以实现缓解,并针对个体患者进行调整,有可能显著提高临床疗效。此外,参与研究的风湿病学家表示,计算机化决策程序在他们的日常临床实践中可能是一个有用的工具。