Antonopoulos Constantine, Voulimeneas Ioannis, Ioannides Pavlos, Kotsifas Theodoros, Kavallieratos Nikolaos, Vagianos Constantine
First Department of Surgery, Nikea General Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):379-83. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181ba8206.
A retrospective analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies, with introduction of selection criteria and estimation of postoperative bile leaks.
All patients who underwent cholecystectomy in a tertiary surgical unit from January 2007 to June 2008 formed 2 categories, laparoscopic and open. The choice of operation was based on patient's present status and past medical history, whereas the decision to convert came from intraoperative findings. All surgeons were experienced in both open and laparoscopic surgeries.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was initially attempted in 230 patients. In 218 of these patients, cholecystectomy was accomplished laparoscopically (group A), whereas in 12 laparoscopic was converted to open cholecystectomy (group B). In 36 patients open cholecystectomy was the first choice according to predecided criteria (group C). Patients of groups B and C were older (P=0.0001), presented higher incidence of cholecystitis (P=0.0001), and required longer postoperative hospitalization (P=0.0001) compared with patients of group A. Postoperative bile leak was evident in 8 patients; no patient from group A, 2 patients from group B, and 6 patients from group C. Patients with bile leak were older (P=0.0001), they required a longer hospitalization (P=0.0001), and cholecystitis was more frequent (P=0.007). Regarding treatment followed, 4 patients required no intervention, whereas 1 required computed tomography-guided drainage of a biloma. Two patients with persistent bile leak, required stenting of the common bile duct with endoscopic sphincterotomy, whereas one, suffering from common bile duct injury, was cured with hepatojejunostomy.
The study highlights the significance of patient selection based on clinical criteria with respect to the type of operation performed. It seems that when patients are selected for laparoscopy according to carefully chosen criteria, the expected postoperative bile leaks could be minimal.
对腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术进行回顾性分析,引入选择标准并评估术后胆漏情况。
2007年1月至2008年6月在一家三级外科单位接受胆囊切除术的所有患者分为两类,即腹腔镜手术组和开腹手术组。手术方式的选择基于患者的当前状况和既往病史,而中转手术的决定则依据术中发现。所有外科医生均具备开腹和腹腔镜手术经验。
最初尝试对230例患者进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。其中218例患者成功完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术(A组),12例由腹腔镜手术转为开腹胆囊切除术(B组)。根据预先确定的标准,36例患者首选开腹胆囊切除术(C组)。与A组患者相比,B组和C组患者年龄更大(P = 0.0001),胆囊炎发病率更高(P = 0.0001),术后住院时间更长(P = 0.0001)。8例患者出现术后胆漏;A组无患者发生胆漏,B组有2例,C组有6例。发生胆漏的患者年龄更大(P = 0.0001),住院时间更长(P = 0.0001),胆囊炎更为常见(P = 0.007)。关于后续治疗,4例患者无需干预,1例需要计算机断层扫描引导下引流胆汁瘤。2例持续性胆漏患者需要内镜括约肌切开术并置入胆总管支架,1例胆总管损伤患者通过肝空肠吻合术治愈。
该研究强调了根据临床标准进行患者选择对于所施行手术类型的重要性。似乎当根据精心选择的标准为患者选择腹腔镜手术时,预期的术后胆漏可能会降至最低。