• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜或开腹阑尾切除术后的身体形象与美容效果

Body image and cosmesis after laparoscopic or open appendectomy.

作者信息

Sucullu Ilker, Filiz Ali Ilker, Canda Aras Emre, Yucel Ergun, Kurt Yavuz, Yildiz Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Training Hopital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):401-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bb8db7.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bb8db7
PMID:19851271
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), are thought to produce better cosmetic results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the body image and cosmesis of patients after both LA and open appendectomy (OA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 2007 and June 2008, patients who underwent LA or OA with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were invited to participate in the study by filling out the body image questionnaire. Patients with OA who had the Rockey-Davis incision and LA patients who had the operation by 3 trocars (10-mm infraumbilical, 5-mm suprapubic and additional 10 mm left lower quadrant), were included in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (20 LA, 18 OA) participated in the study. The mean incision size for OA was 3.2 cm (range, 2 to 6 cm), and the mean scores from the body image questionnaire (both body image scale and cosmetic scale) were similar for both groups (P>0.05). No significant complications or changes in self-confidence (preoperative vs. postoperative) were observed in either group (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, there is no study in the literature that evaluates body image and cosmesis using objective methods for LA. Our results showed that LA has no advantage for body image and cosmesis over OA. Furthermore, prospective studies using different tools with a larger sample size are needed to rationalize the use of laparoscopy for appendectomy.

摘要

引言

诸如腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)等微创技术被认为能产生更好的美容效果。本研究的目的是评估接受LA和开腹阑尾切除术(OA)的患者的身体形象和美容效果。

患者与方法

在2007年8月至2008年6月期间,邀请诊断为急性阑尾炎并接受LA或OA的患者填写身体形象问卷以参与研究。采用Rockey-Davis切口的OA患者以及通过3个套管针(10毫米脐下、5毫米耻骨上和额外的10毫米左下腹)进行手术的LA患者被纳入研究。

结果

共有38名患者(20名LA,18名OA)参与了研究。OA的平均切口大小为3.2厘米(范围为2至6厘米),两组的身体形象问卷(身体形象量表和美容量表)的平均得分相似(P>0.05)。两组均未观察到明显并发症或自信心(术前与术后)的变化(P>0.05)。

结论

据我们所知,文献中尚无使用客观方法评估LA患者身体形象和美容效果的研究。我们的结果表明,LA在身体形象和美容效果方面并不优于OA。此外,需要使用不同工具并以更大样本量进行前瞻性研究,以合理化腹腔镜阑尾切除术的应用。

相似文献

1
Body image and cosmesis after laparoscopic or open appendectomy.腹腔镜或开腹阑尾切除术后的身体形象与美容效果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):401-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bb8db7.
2
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
3
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: retrospective assessment of 200 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:200例患者的回顾性评估
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):178-82.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy performed above the pubic symphysis - a new scarless approach.耻骨联合上方单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术——一种新的无瘢痕手术方法。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011 Jan;20(1):18-21. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.518672.
8
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
9
[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with chronic appendicitis].[慢性阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术对比]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Jul;10(4):359-61.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of preoperative risk factors associated with the conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomies.腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹阑尾切除术相关术前危险因素的识别
Int Surg. 2013 Oct-Dec;98(4):334-9. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00058.1.
2
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: a preliminary multicentric comparative study in 87 patients with acute appendicitis.单孔经脐腹腔镜阑尾切除术:87例急性阑尾炎患者的初步多中心比较研究
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:492409. doi: 10.1155/2012/492409. Epub 2012 May 13.
3
Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site(®) robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases.
使用新型单部位(®)机器人平台进行胆囊切除术:45 例连续病例的早期经验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2687-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2227-2. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
4
Initial experience of the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in different clinical conditions.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术在不同临床情况下可行性的初步经验。
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2010;2010:240260. doi: 10.1155/2010/240260. Epub 2010 Apr 13.