Suppr超能文献

各种镍钛封闭线圈弹簧的力。

Forces of various nickel titanium closed coil springs.

机构信息

Dentistry/Orthodontics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467-2490, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):182-7. doi: 10.2319/011509-592.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the forces generated by 14 different 9 mm springs supplied by five different companies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five replicates of 14 different 9 mm springs were evaluated, resulting in 70 total specimens. Each was extended once from its resting length to 12 mm and then was deactivated. All tests were performed in a 37 degrees C water bath. Forces were recorded at the 12 mm extension and deactivation distances of 9 mm, 6 mm, 3 mm, and 1 mm using an MTS force gauge. Data were collected with Testworks software, version 4.0, and were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with one factor alternated.

RESULTS

Mean peak load forces at 12 mm were significantly different between springs, and these forces varied from 147 to 474 grams. Mean unload forces measured at 9 mm, 6 mm, and 3 mm of deactivation values were highly variable, and only 6 of the 14 springs exhibited a "physiologic" mean unload force of 50 grams or less over the total deactivation range.

CONCLUSIONS

Few springs tested exhibited physiologic peak load forces and constant deactivation forces. This study suggests that labeling of nickel titanium closed coil springs is confusing and misleading.

摘要

目的

比较 5 家公司供应的 14 种不同 9 毫米弹簧产生的力。

材料与方法

评估了 5 个重复的 14 种不同的 9 毫米弹簧,共 70 个标本。每个标本从其静止长度延长至 12 毫米,然后停用。所有测试均在 37°C水浴中进行。使用 MTS 力计在 12 毫米延长和停用距离为 9 毫米、6 毫米、3 毫米和 1 毫米处记录力。使用 Testworks 软件,版本 4.0 收集数据,并通过交替单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行分析。

结果

12 毫米时的平均峰值负荷力在弹簧之间存在显著差异,这些力的范围从 147 克到 474 克不等。在停用值为 9 毫米、6 毫米和 3 毫米时测量的平均卸载力变化很大,只有 14 个弹簧中的 6 个在整个停用范围内表现出 50 克或更小的“生理”平均卸载力。

结论

很少有测试的弹簧表现出生理峰值力和恒定的停用力。本研究表明,镍钛封闭线圈弹簧的标签是混乱和误导的。

相似文献

1
Forces of various nickel titanium closed coil springs.各种镍钛封闭线圈弹簧的力。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):182-7. doi: 10.2319/011509-592.1.
2
In-vivo force decay of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs.镍钛合金闭圈弹簧体内的力衰减。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4):505-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.023.
3
Force characteristics of nickel-titanium tension coil springs.镍钛拉簧的力特性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 May;115(5):498-507. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70271-4.
4
Force levels of 23 nickel-titanium open-coil springs in compression testing.压缩测试中 23 根镍钛开圈弹簧的力水平。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.033.

引用本文的文献

6
Deformation of nickel-titanium closed coil springs: an in vitro study.镍钛封闭螺旋弹簧的变形:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):38-46. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.038-046.oar.
10
In-vivo force decay of nickel-titanium closed-coil springs.镍钛合金闭圈弹簧体内的力衰减。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4):505-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.023.

本文引用的文献

5
Force characteristics of nickel-titanium tension coil springs.镍钛拉簧的力特性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 May;115(5):498-507. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70271-4.
8
Force delivery of Ni-Ti coil springs.镍钛合金螺旋弹簧的强制输送。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Jan;109(1):8-21. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70158-0.
9
Force generation by orthodontic coil springs.正畸螺旋弹簧产生的力
Angle Orthod. 1993 Summer;63(2):145-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1993)063<0145:FGBOCS>2.0.CO;2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验