• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗服务提供者对患者提供的家族病史的反应。

Primary care providers' responses to patient-generated family history.

作者信息

Fuller Melissa, Myers Melanie, Webb Thomas, Tabangin Meredith, Prows Cynthia

机构信息

College of Allied Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2010 Feb;19(1):84-96. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9264-6. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-009-9264-6
PMID:19856089
Abstract

Family health history is one of the best predictors of an individual's risk for common disease, yet it is underutilized in routine care. Although the Surgeon General has recommended consumers record their family health history and share it with their health care provider, providers' perceptions of patient-generated family histories are unknown. To learn more about providers' experience with and perceptions about patient-generated family histories, we mailed surveys to 301 providers and had a response rate of 24% (n = 68). Seventy-three percent felt a patient-generated computer pedigree would improve their ability to assess risk as compared to their current methods. Seventy percent felt a patient-generated computer pedigree would either have no effect on or would increase the number of patients that could be seen in a day. Results suggest that providers appreciate the potential benefits of patient-generated family histories. Genetic counselors and nurses are in a prime position to promote and facilitate the use of patient-generated family health histories in routine care.

摘要

家族健康史是预测个体患常见疾病风险的最佳指标之一,但在常规医疗中却未得到充分利用。尽管卫生局局长已建议消费者记录其家族健康史并与医疗服务提供者分享,但提供者对患者提供的家族病史的看法尚不清楚。为了更多地了解提供者对患者提供的家族病史的经验和看法,我们向301名提供者邮寄了调查问卷,回复率为24%(n = 68)。73%的人认为,与目前的方法相比,患者提供的计算机化系谱图将提高他们评估风险的能力。70%的人认为,患者提供的计算机化系谱图要么不会产生影响,要么会增加一天内可接待的患者数量。结果表明,提供者认识到患者提供的家族病史的潜在益处。遗传咨询师和护士最有条件在常规医疗中推广和促进使用患者提供的家族健康史。

相似文献

1
Primary care providers' responses to patient-generated family history.基层医疗服务提供者对患者提供的家族病史的反应。
J Genet Couns. 2010 Feb;19(1):84-96. doi: 10.1007/s10897-009-9264-6. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
2
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
3
Cross-Disciplinary Perceptions of Structured Interprofessional Rounds in Promoting Teamwork Within an Academic Tertiary Care Obstetric Unit.跨学科视角下结构化跨专业查房对学术型三级护理产科单元团队协作的促进作用
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1968-1977. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001890.
4
Assessing health-care providers' readiness for reporting quality and patient safety indicators at primary health-care centres in Lebanon: a national cross-sectional survey.评估黎巴嫩初级保健中心医护人员报告质量和患者安全指标的准备情况:一项全国性横断面调查。
Hum Resour Health. 2015 May 22;13:37. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0031-5.
5
Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study.医疗保健提供者对用于跟踪健康的消费级设备和应用程序的看法:一项试点研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 22;7(1):e9929. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9929.
6
Conceptual bases and methodology for the evaluation of women's and providers' perception of the quality of antenatal care in the WHO Antenatal Care Randomised Controlled Trial.世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验中评估妇女及医护人员对产前护理质量认知的概念基础与方法
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:98-115. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00009.x.
7
Electronic consultation system demonstrates educational benefit for primary care providers.电子咨询系统为初级保健提供者带来了教育效益。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Aug;24(7):465-472. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17711822. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
8
Providers' perceptions of barriers to the management of type 2 diabetes in remote Aboriginal settings.医疗服务提供者对偏远原住民地区2型糖尿病管理障碍的看法。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2011;70(5):552-63. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v70i5.17848. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
9
Mental Health Care Providers' Views of Their Work with Consumers and Their Reports of Recovery-Orientation, Job Satisfaction, and Personal Growth.心理健康护理提供者对其与消费者工作的看法以及他们对康复导向、工作满意度和个人成长的报告。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Oct;52(7):757-66. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9927-8. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
10
What's in a Name? Health Care Providers' Perceptions of Pediatric Pain Patients Based on Diagnostic Labels.名字有何影响?医疗服务提供者基于诊断标签对儿科疼痛患者的看法。
Clin J Pain. 2017 Aug;33(8):694-698. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000454.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of family cancer history collection tools in oncology clinical practices.在肿瘤临床实践中实施癌症家族史收集工具的障碍和促进因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):631-639. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad243.
2
The value of parental medical records for the prediction of diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a novel method for generating and incorporating family histories.父母医疗记录在预测糖尿病和心血管疾病方面的价值:一种生成和纳入家族史的新方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Nov 17;30(12):1915-1924. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad154.
3
Barriers to family history collection among Spanish-speaking primary care patients: a BRIDGE qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
A family history demonstration project among women in an urban Appalachian community.阿巴拉契亚城市社区女性家族史示范项目。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Summer;3(2):155-63. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0061.
2
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.加权kappa系数:用于衡量名义尺度上的一致性,并考虑了尺度不一致或部分得分的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
3
Cancer risk assessment: examining the family physician's role.癌症风险评估:审视家庭医生的角色。
西班牙语初级保健患者家族史收集的障碍:一项BRIDGE定性研究。
PEC Innov. 2022 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100087. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
4
Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems.电子健康记录中家族病史和家族癌症病史的差异与性别、种族、西班牙裔或拉丁裔以及在 2 个大型美国医疗保健系统中的语言偏好的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2234574. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34574.
5
Physicians' strategies for using family history data: having the data is not the same as using the data.医生使用家族病史数据的策略:拥有数据并不等同于使用数据。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Oct 8;3(3):378-385. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa035. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial.比较在两个医疗保健系统中符合遗传评估标准的初级保健患者中提供癌症遗传学服务的交付模式:BRIDGE 随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06489-y.
7
Genetics in primary care: validating a tool to pre-symptomatically assess common disease risk using an Australian questionnaire on family history.初级保健中的遗传学:使用一份关于家族史的澳大利亚问卷来验证一种用于症状前评估常见疾病风险的工具。
Clin Transl Med. 2019 May 2;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40169-019-0233-x.
8
Patient experience with family history tool: analysis of patients' experience sharing their family health history through patient-computer dialogue in a patient portal.患者对家族史工具的体验:通过患者门户中的医患对话分析患者分享家族健康史的体验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):603-609. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz008.
9
A Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model of multiple informant family health histories.多来源家庭成员健康史的贝叶斯分层逻辑回归模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0700-5.
10
Assessing family history of chronic disease in primary care: Prevalence, documentation, and appropriate screening.在初级保健中评估慢性病家族史:患病率、记录情况及适当筛查
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jan;63(1):e58-e67.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;19(5):468-77. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468.
4
Perceptions of family history across common diseases: a qualitative study in primary care.常见疾病家族病史认知:一项初级保健中的定性研究
Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;23(4):472-80. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml006. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
5
Harnessing the power of the pedigree.利用谱系的力量。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 May-Jun;50(3):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.02.003.
6
Colon cancer risk counseling by health-care providers: perceived barriers and response to an internet-based cancer risk appraisal instrument.医疗保健提供者进行的结肠癌风险咨询:感知到的障碍以及对基于互联网的癌症风险评估工具的反应。
J Cancer Educ. 2004 Summer;19(2):95-7. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce1902_9.
7
Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview.癌症风险评估:家族史访谈的质量与影响
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Oct;27(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.003.
8
Reconsidering the family history in primary care.重新审视初级保健中的家族病史。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):273-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30401.x.
9
Cancer risk assessment from family history: gaps in primary care practice.基于家族病史的癌症风险评估:初级医疗实践中的差距
J Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;51(10):856.
10
Research priorities for evaluating family history in the prevention of common chronic diseases.评估家族病史在常见慢性病预防中的研究重点。
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00585-8.