• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从个体差异的角度考察项目识别、来源识别和回忆之间的关系。

Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1578-85. doi: 10.1037/a0017255.

DOI:10.1037/a0017255
PMID:19857028
Abstract

The authors of the current study examined the relationships among item-recognition, source-recognition, free recall, and other memory and cognitive ability tasks via an individual differences analysis. Two independent sources of variance contributed to item-recognition and source-recognition performance, and these two constructs related differentially to other memory and cognitive ability constructs. The results are in accordance with a dual-process theory of memory retrieval in which a familiarity process can support judgments of previous occurrence and a more strategic recollection process is needed for controlled search of long-term memory. Furthermore, the authors offer additional evidence in favor of a dual-process model by showing validity for these two unique sources of variance.

摘要

本研究的作者通过个体差异分析考察了项目识别、来源识别、自由回忆以及其他记忆和认知能力任务之间的关系。项目识别和来源识别表现受到两个独立的方差源的影响,这两个结构与其他记忆和认知能力结构的关系不同。结果与记忆检索的双加工理论一致,其中熟悉过程可以支持先前发生的判断,而需要更策略性的回忆过程来进行长期记忆的控制搜索。此外,作者通过显示这两个独特方差源的有效性,为双加工模型提供了额外的证据。

相似文献

1
Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.从个体差异的角度考察项目识别、来源识别和回忆之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1578-85. doi: 10.1037/a0017255.
2
Intra- and inter-item associations doubly dissociate the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection.项目内和项目间关联双重分离了熟悉度和回忆的电生理相关物。
Neuron. 2006 Nov 9;52(3):535-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.013.
3
Using maintenance rehearsal to explore recognition memory.利用维护排练来探索识别记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):147-59. doi: 10.1037/a0017687.
4
Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials.熟悉度和回忆对联想识别记忆的贡献:来自事件相关电位的见解。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1595-605. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1595.
5
Effect of study context on item recollection.研究背景对项目回忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jul;63(7):1318-34. doi: 10.1080/17470210903348613. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
6
On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.论工作记忆与长期记忆的划分及其与智力的关系:一种潜在变量方法。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
7
Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.概念启动和熟悉度:在具有不同神经生理学相关性的识别测试中记忆的不同表现形式。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Nov;22(11):2638-51. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21341.
8
Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.项目识别任务中编码与检索时的视觉相似性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jul;62(7):1277-84. doi: 10.1080/17470210802680769. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
9
The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.初级记忆和次级记忆对工作记忆容量的贡献:即时自由回忆的个体差异分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):240-7. doi: 10.1037/a0017739.
10
Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.编码方式可以通过检索方向影响记忆准确性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):516-21. doi: 10.1037/a0022217.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Cognitive Correlates of Semantic and Perceptual False Memory in Older and Younger Adults: A Multi-Group Latent Variable Approach.探究老年人和年轻人语义及知觉错误记忆的认知关联:一种多组潜变量方法。
J Mem Lang. 2025 Apr;142. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2025.104625. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Individual differences in learning and memory abilities: The influence of self-efficacy.学习与记忆能力的个体差异:自我效能感的影响
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01693-1.
3
Connecting working and long-term memory: Bayesian-hierarchical multinomial model-based analyses reveal storage next to retrieval differences.
连接工作记忆和长时记忆:基于贝叶斯层次多项模型的分析揭示了存储和检索的差异。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1915-1927. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01627-3. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
4
Stop Worrying about Multiple-Choice: Fact Knowledge Does Not Change with Response Format.别再担心多项选择题了:事实性知识不会因答题格式而改变。
J Intell. 2022 Nov 14;10(4):102. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040102.
5
Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.探索语音和语义表征在工作记忆中的应用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Nov;48(11):1638-1659. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001077. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Empathy reduces susceptibility to false memory.同理心降低产生错误记忆的可能性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 25;11(1):22903. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02281-4.
7
Individual differences in value-directed remembering.价值导向记忆中的个体差异。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104275. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Paranormal psychic believers and skeptics: a large-scale test of the cognitive differences hypothesis.超自然通灵信仰者与怀疑论者:认知差异假说的大规模检验
Mem Cognit. 2016 Feb;44(2):242-61. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0563-x.
9
Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation.工作记忆广度较低的个体由于源监控能力差,会受到无关信息的更大干扰,而不是更大的激活。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):357-66. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0465-3.
10
Recollection, not familiarity, decreases in healthy ageing: Converging evidence from four estimation methods.在健康衰老过程中,回忆能力而非熟悉度会下降:来自四种评估方法的一致证据。
Memory. 2016;24(1):75-88. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.985590. Epub 2014 Dec 8.