• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学会网站上患者信息的可读性分析。

Readability analysis of patient information on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery website.

作者信息

Greywoode Jewel, Bluman Eric, Spiegel Joseph, Boon Maurits

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Nov;141(5):555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.004
PMID:19861189
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the readability of patient-oriented online health information (OHI) presented on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) website.

STUDY DESIGN

Review of the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade level for 104 articles on the AAO-HNS website.

METHODS

The FK grade level for 104 articles was determined using the readability calculator available within Microsoft Office Word 2003. The interobserver reliability for the FK grade level was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for 52 entries.

RESULTS

The average FK grade reading level of the articles was 10.8 (range 6.3-16.7; 95% CI, 10.4-11.2). Eighty-one percent of the articles were written at a ninth grade level or higher. The intraclass correlation was good (r = 0.83) for the 52 articles that were independently reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis has shown that the average reading level for each article on the AAO-HNS site was higher than the recommended sixth grade reading level. Although the AAO-HNS site is written at a higher level than that suggested for the general public, it is important to realize that readability is just one consideration in the evaluation of OHI comprehension. Physicians need to be cognizant of their patients' ability to read and comprehend written information and tailor their educational material appropriately.

摘要

目的

评估美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学会(AAO-HNS)网站上提供的面向患者的在线健康信息(OHI)的可读性。

研究设计

回顾AAO-HNS网站上104篇文章的弗莱什-金凯德(FK)年级水平。

方法

使用Microsoft Office Word 2003中可用的可读性计算器确定104篇文章的FK年级水平。通过计算52篇文章条目的组内相关系数(ICC)来确定FK年级水平的观察者间信度。

结果

文章的平均FK年级阅读水平为10.8(范围6.3 - 16.7;95%可信区间,10.4 - 11.2)。81%的文章写作水平达到九年级或更高。对52篇独立评审的文章而言,组内相关性良好(r = 0.83)。

结论

该分析表明,AAO-HNS网站上每篇文章的平均阅读水平高于推荐的六年级阅读水平。尽管AAO-HNS网站的写作水平高于针对普通大众建议的水平,但重要的是要认识到,可读性只是评估OHI理解情况时的一个考虑因素。医生需要了解其患者阅读和理解书面信息的能力,并适当地调整他们的教育材料。

相似文献

1
Readability analysis of patient information on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery website.美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学会网站上患者信息的可读性分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Nov;141(5):555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
2
Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.基于互联网的消费者健康信息的可读性评估。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1310-5.
3
Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻喉科学-头颈外科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Sep;147(3):466-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599812442783. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.脊柱相关患者教育资料的易读性:来自专业组织和脊柱医生网站的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.
5
Readability and comprehensibility of patient education material in hand-related web sites.手部相关网站上患者教育材料的可读性和可理解性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Sep;34(7):1308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
6
Readability Trends of Online Information by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科基金会在线信息的可读性趋势
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan;156(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/0194599816674711. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Readability of the American, Canadian, and British Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Societies' Patient Materials.美国、加拿大和英国耳鼻喉科学会-头颈外科学会患者材料的可读性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 May;166(5):862-868. doi: 10.1177/01945998211033254. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.美国儿科学会牙科患者教育材料的可读性。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.
9
Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.美国矫形外科医师学会的大多数在线患者教育材料超过了普通患者的阅读水平。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4071-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
10
Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美关节镜协会网站上有关关节镜相关患者教育资料的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Indian endocrine surgery websites are they comparable?印度内分泌外科手术网站具有可比性吗?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov 18;60:487-490. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.021. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
The internet as a source of information for De Quervain's tendinitis.互联网作为桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎信息的来源。
Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):131-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9657-3.
3
Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.我们是否有效地告知了患者?对美国神经放射学会在线患者教育资源的定量分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1270-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3854. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?互联网上关于外侧上髁炎的信息质量、准确性和可读性是否会因所使用的搜索词而异?
Hand (N Y). 2012 Dec;7(4):420-5. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9443-z.