• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国耳鼻喉科学-头颈外科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。

Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Sep;147(3):466-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599812442783. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1177/0194599812442783
PMID:22473833
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Americans are increasingly turning to the Internet as a source of health care information. These online resources should be written at a level readily understood by the average American. This study evaluates the readability of online patient education information available from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) professional Web site using 7 different assessment tools that analyze the materials for reading ease and grade level of its target audience.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Analysis of Internet-based patient education material from the AAO-HNSF Web site.

METHODS

Online patient education material from the AAO-HNSF was downloaded in January 2012 and assessed for level of readability using the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG grading, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning-Fog Index, Raygor Readability Estimate graph, and Fry Readability graph. The text from each subsection was pasted as plain text into Microsoft Word document, and each subsection was subjected to readability analysis using the software package Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2012.1.

RESULTS

All health care education material assessed is written between an 11th grade and graduate reading level and is considered "difficult to read" by the assessment scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Online patient education materials on the AAO-HNSF Web site are written above the recommended 6th grade level and may need to be revised to make them more easily understood by a broader audience.

摘要

目的

越来越多的美国人开始将互联网作为获取医疗保健信息的来源。这些在线资源的文字表述应该易于普通美国民众理解。本研究采用 7 种不同的评估工具,评估美国耳鼻喉科学会-头颈外科学会基金会(AAO-HNSF)专业网站上提供的在线患者教育信息的可读性,这些工具可分析阅读的简易程度和目标受众的年级水平。

研究设计与设置

分析 AAO-HNSF 网站上的基于互联网的患者教育材料。

方法

下载 AAO-HNSF 网站上的在线患者教育材料,并使用弗莱什阅读容易度、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、简易阅读评估、科尔曼-廖氏指数、冈宁-福格阅读指数、雷戈尔阅读估计图和弗莱阅读图等 7 种不同的评估工具来评估其阅读的简易程度。将每个部分的文本粘贴到 Microsoft Word 文档中,然后使用 Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2012.1 软件包对每个部分的文本进行可读性分析。

结果

所有评估的医疗保健教育材料的阅读水平均在 11 年级至研究生水平之间,且根据评估标准,这些材料都被认为“难以阅读”。

结论

AAO-HNSF 网站上的在线患者教育材料的书写水平超过了推荐的 6 年级水平,可能需要进行修改,以便更广泛的受众群体能够更容易地理解。

相似文献

1
Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻喉科学-头颈外科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Sep;147(3):466-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599812442783. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.美国鼻科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Apr;3(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/alr.21097. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments.评估耳鼻喉-头颈外科学术部门在线患者教育材料的可读性。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
5
Readability assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites.评估主要耳鼻喉科协会网站上患者教育材料的可读性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Nov;147(5):848-54. doi: 10.1177/0194599812456152. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
6
Readability Trends of Online Information by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科基金会在线信息的可读性趋势
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan;156(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/0194599816674711. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.基于网络的面部骨折患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1943-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23424. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
Readability analysis of patient information on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery website.美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学会网站上患者信息的可读性分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Nov;141(5):555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.基于互联网的内镜鼻窦手术相关患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
10
Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.在线泌尿科患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1048-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Multilingual Patient Education: ChatGPT's Accuracy and Readability for SSNHL Queries in English and Spanish.加强多语言患者教育:ChatGPT对英文和西班牙文突发性聋查询的准确性和可读性
OTO Open. 2024 Dec 11;8(4):e70048. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70048. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
2
Limitations of readability assessment tools.可读性评估工具的局限性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):5021-5022. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08716-8. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Evaluation of the Accuracy, Credibility, and Readability of Statin-Related Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.
他汀类药物相关网站的准确性、可信度和可读性评估:横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Mar 14;13:e42849. doi: 10.2196/42849.
4
ChatGPT vs. web search for patient questions: what does ChatGPT do better?ChatGPT 与网页搜索在解答患者问题上的对比:ChatGPT 有哪些优势?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;281(6):3219-3225. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08524-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
Comprehensiveness of online sources for patient education on hereditary hearing impairment.遗传性听力障碍患者教育在线资源的全面性。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 19;11:1147207. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1147207. eCollection 2023.
6
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Congenital Hand Differences.先天性手部差异在线患者教育资料的可读性。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Oct;19(7):1146-1153. doi: 10.1177/15589447231168907. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
A critical readability and quality analysis of internet-based patient information on neck dissections.基于互联网的颈部解剖患者信息的关键可读性与质量分析
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 26;9(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.07.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information.在线猴痘患者教育材料的易读性:为了传播传染病信息,需要提高对健康素养的认识。
Infect Dis Health. 2023 May;28(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
Comprehension Profile of Patient Education Materials in Endocrine Care.内分泌护理中患者教育材料的理解概况。
Kans J Med. 2022 Jul 21;15(2):247-252. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study.加拿大主要儿科协会基于网络的患者教育材料可读性评估:横断面研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 16;5(1):e31820. doi: 10.2196/31820.