Hospital of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.
J Exp Med. 1925 Apr 30;41(5):623-30. doi: 10.1084/jem.41.5.623.
The results of these experiments support the previous observations that mice react in different ways to the inhalation of different bacteria. If normal mice are sprayed with hemolytic streptococci or Friedländer's bacillus, these organisms may be recovered from the lungs and heart's blood for a number of days after exposure. A large number of mice so exposed die of a septicemia during the 30 days following spraying. Consolidation of one or more lobes is not rare. If normal mice are exposed to an atmosphere of pneumococci, however, the organisms rapidly disappear from the lungs and only an occasional mouse succumbs to pneumococcus septicemia. In order to cause the pneumococcus to invade, the mice must first be alcoholized. If mice are first alcoholized and then exposed to a pneumococcus atmosphere, the pneumococci persist for a longer time in the lungs and a number will die of septicemia, a state of affairs which resembles that seen after the administration to normal mice of the other two organisms studied. In order to produce pneumococcus lobar consolidation, however, the mice must be first partially immunized and then allowed to inhale the organisms while under the influence of alcohol. A large percentage of both the normal and immune mice so alcoholized die within 5 days of exposure. There also appears to be a definite relation between the mortality and the length of time inspired bacteria persist in the lungs. Whether this lag in removal allows multiplication of the bacteria and massive infection to occur has not been determined. Following inhalation of pneumococcus, the organisms were either removed rapidly and without apparent detriment to the animal, or, as in the case of the alcoholized mice, invasion occurred, in which event the mouse usually succumbed rapidly, localization in the lung only occurring in partially immune animals. In the case of the hemolytic streptococci and Bacillus friedlaenderi, however, the whole process of removal and infection seems to be slower. Infection and pneumonia occurred more often. These organisms seem to possess much greater invasive power when inhaled than the pneumococcus, though on intraperitoneal or subcutaneous inoculation, pneumococcus is highly virulent for normal mice.
这些实验的结果支持了之前的观察结果,即小鼠对不同细菌的吸入会产生不同的反应。如果正常小鼠被喷洒溶血链球菌或弗氏杆菌,这些生物体在暴露后数天内仍可从肺部和心脏血液中回收。大量暴露于这些细菌的小鼠在喷洒后 30 天内死于败血症。一个或多个肺叶的实变并不罕见。然而,如果正常小鼠暴露于肺炎球菌的环境中,这些生物体很快就会从肺部消失,只有偶尔的小鼠会死于肺炎球菌败血症。为了使肺炎球菌入侵,小鼠必须首先被酒精化。如果小鼠首先被酒精化,然后暴露于肺炎球菌环境中,那么肺炎球菌在肺部的持续时间会更长,并且有一些会死于败血症,这种情况类似于向正常小鼠施用研究的其他两种生物体后观察到的情况。然而,为了产生肺炎球菌肺叶实变,小鼠必须首先进行部分免疫,然后在酒精的影响下吸入这些生物体。大量的正常和免疫小鼠在暴露后 5 天内死亡。在去除细菌的时间长短与死亡率之间似乎也存在明确的关系。这种细菌在肺部停留时间的延迟是否允许细菌繁殖和大量感染发生尚未确定。吸入肺炎球菌后,这些生物体要么迅速被清除而对动物没有明显损害,要么像酒精化小鼠那样发生入侵,在这种情况下,小鼠通常会迅速死亡,仅在部分免疫动物中发生肺部定位。然而,对于溶血性链球菌和弗氏杆菌,整个清除和感染过程似乎较慢。感染和肺炎更常发生。这些生物体在吸入时似乎具有比肺炎球菌更强的侵袭力,尽管在腹腔内或皮下接种时,肺炎球菌对正常小鼠具有高度的毒力。