Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Med Teach. 2009 Oct;31(10):910-7. doi: 10.3109/01421590802534932.
Globalization discourse, and its promises of a 'flat world', 'borderless economy' and 'mobility of ideas and people', has become very widespread in all fields. In medical education this discourse is underpinned by assumptions that medical competence has universal elements and that medical education can therefore develop 'global standards' for accreditation, curricula and examinations. Yet writers in the field other than medicine have raised a number of concerns about an overemphasis on the economic aspects of globalization. This article explores the notion that it is time to study and embrace differences and discontinuities in goals, practices and values that underpin medical competence in different countries and to critically examine the promises-realized or broken-of globalization discourse in medical education.
全球化话语及其关于“扁平世界”、“无边界经济”和“思想与人员的流动”的承诺已在各个领域广泛传播。在医学教育中,这种话语的基础是假设医学能力具有普遍要素,因此医学教育可以为认证、课程和考试制定“全球标准”。然而,医学领域以外的作家对过分强调全球化的经济方面提出了一些担忧。本文探讨了这样一种观点,即现在是时候研究和接受不同国家医学能力背后的目标、实践和价值观的差异和不连续性,并批判性地审视全球化话语在医学教育中的承诺实现或破灭。