• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Acceptance and confidence of central and peripheral misinformation.

作者信息

Luna Karlos, Migueles Malen

机构信息

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad del País Vasco, Avda. Tolosa, 70, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2009 Nov;12(2):405-13. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600001797.

DOI:10.1017/s1138741600001797
PMID:19899643
Abstract

We examined the memory for central and peripheral information concerning a crime and the acceptance of false information. We also studied eyewitnesses' confidence in their memory. Participants were shown a video depicting a bank robbery and a questionnaire was used to introduce false central and peripheral information. The next day the participants completed a recognition task in which they rated the confidence of their responses. Performance was better for central information and participants registered more false alarms for peripheral contents. The cognitive system's limited attentional capacity and the greater information capacity of central elements may facilitate processing the more important information. The presentation of misinformation seriously impaired eyewitness memory by prompting a more lenient response criterion. Participants were more confident with central than with peripheral information. Eyewitness memory is easily distorted in peripheral aspects but it is more difficult to make mistakes with central information. However, when false information is introduced, errors in central information can be accompanied by high confidence, thus rendering them credible and legally serious.

摘要

相似文献

1
Acceptance and confidence of central and peripheral misinformation.
Span J Psychol. 2009 Nov;12(2):405-13. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600001797.
2
I misremember it well: why older adults are unreliable eyewitnesses.我清楚地记错了:为何老年人是不可靠的目击者。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):770-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03193995.
3
Retrieval does not always enhance suggestibility: testing can improve witness identification performance.检索并不总是增强暗示性:测试可以提高证人识别能力。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Dec;36(6):478-87. doi: 10.1037/h0093931. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
4
Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.回忆一个有他人见证的事件会增加目击者的易受暗示性:反向测试效应。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):66-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02245.x. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.接种还是解毒?认知访谈时机对强行编造事件虚假记忆的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Apr;34(2):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
6
Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.创伤与记忆:事件后错误信息、检索顺序及保持间隔的影响
Memory. 2008 Jan;16(1):58-75. doi: 10.1080/09658210701363146.
7
Memory for actions of an event: older and younger adults compared.事件行为记忆:老年人和年轻人比较。
J Gen Psychol. 2009 Oct;136(4):428-41. doi: 10.1080/00221300903269816.
8
False recognition and source attribution for actions of an emotional event in older and younger adults.老年人和年轻人对情绪事件行为的错误识别及来源归因
Exp Aging Res. 2011 May;37(3):310-29. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2011.568829.
9
The effects of repeatedly recalling a traumatic event on eyewitness memory and suggestibility.反复回忆创伤性事件对目击者记忆和暗示性的影响。
Memory. 2019 Apr;27(4):536-547. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1533563. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
10
The gestural misinformation effect: skewing eyewitness testimony through gesture.手势误导效应:通过手势扭曲目击者证词
Am J Psychol. 2013 Fall;126(3):301-14. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.3.0301.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between latent inhibition, divergent thinking, and eyewitness memory: A study on attention to irrelevant stimuli.潜伏抑制、发散性思维与目击证人记忆之间的关系:一项关于对无关刺激的注意力的研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0315158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315158. eCollection 2025.
2
If you express it in the form of a negation, you can expect an effect similar to misinformation.如果你以否定的形式表达它,你可以预期会产生类似于错误信息的效果。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Jul 2;31(4):638-658. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206865. eCollection 2024.
3
False Memories in Native and Foreign Languages.
母语和外语中的错误记忆。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 28;12:716336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716336. eCollection 2021.
4
Emergence and transmission of misinformation in the context of social interactions.社交互动背景下的错误信息的出现和传播。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jan;49(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01081-x.
5
Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms.自我传递的错误信息——融合选择盲视与错误信息效应范式。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173606. eCollection 2017.
6
Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.用于检测欺骗的策略性访谈:多次访谈中的欺骗线索
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 1;7:1702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01702. eCollection 2016.
7
Are regulatory strategies necessary in the regulation of accuracy? The effect of direct-access answers.在准确性监管方面,监管策略是否必要?直接获取答案的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1180-92. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0534-2.
8
Monitoring the source monitoring.监测源监测。
Cogn Process. 2013 Nov;14(4):347-56. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0558-0. Epub 2013 Apr 4.