Suppr超能文献

医院急性医疗单位的有效性:系统评价。

Effectiveness of acute medical units in hospitals: a systematic review.

机构信息

Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane 4102, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Dec;21(6):397-407. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp045.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of acute medical units (AMUs) in hospitals.

DATA SOURCES

(i) Controlled and observational studies in peer-reviewed journals retrieved from PubMed, EPOC, CINAHL and ERIC databases published between January 1990 and July 2008; and (ii) reports from non-peer-reviewed websites combined with Google search.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles reporting effects of the introduction of an AMU on mortality, length of stay, discharge disposition, readmissions, resource use and patient and/or staff satisfaction. Data extraction Data on unit operations and outcome measures were extracted by a single author and confirmed by a second author, with disagreement settled by consensus.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Nine peer-reviewed reports of before-after analyses of seven units introduced into the UK and Ireland were analysed. Two studies, one prospective, reported significant reductions in in-patient mortality between 0.6 and 5.6% points following commencement of AMU. Four studies reported significant reductions in the length of stay between 1.5 and 2.5 days. Waiting times for patient transfer from emergency departments to medical beds decreased by 30% in one study. In three studies, the proportion of medical patients discharged directly home from the AMU increased by 8-25% points. Three studies noted no increase in 30-day readmission rates following unit commencement. Two studies described significant improvements in patient and staff satisfaction with care. Eight non-peer-reviewed reports relating to 48 units confirmed reductions in the length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Limited observational data suggest AMUs reduce in-patient mortality, length of stay and emergency department access block without increasing readmission rates, and improve patient and staff satisfaction.

摘要

目的

评估医院内急症医疗单位(AMU)的效果。

资料来源

(i)从PubMed、EPOC、CINAHL 和 ERIC 数据库中检索到的同行评审期刊中的对照和观察性研究,这些研究发表于 1990 年 1 月至 2008 年 7 月期间;(ii)非同行评审网站的报告与 Google 搜索相结合。

研究选择

报告介绍 AMU 引入对死亡率、住院时间、出院安排、再入院率、资源使用以及患者和/或工作人员满意度的影响的文章。

数据提取

一位作者提取了关于单位运作和结果衡量的资料,第二位作者对这些资料进行了确认,若有意见分歧,则通过协商解决。

资料综合结果

分析了 9 篇关于英国和爱尔兰引入的 7 个 AMU 的前后对照分析的同行评审报告。两项研究,一项前瞻性研究,报告称 AMU 启用后,住院死亡率降低了 0.6-5.6 个百分点。四项研究报告称住院时间缩短了 1.5-2.5 天。一项研究中,患者从急诊科转移到医疗床位的等候时间减少了 30%。在三项研究中,直接从 AMU 出院的内科患者比例增加了 8-25 个百分点。三项研究指出,启用 AMU 后 30 天内的再入院率没有增加。两项研究描述了患者和工作人员对护理满意度的显著提高。48 个单位的 8 份非同行评审报告证实,住院时间缩短了。

结论

有限的观察数据表明,AMU 可降低住院死亡率、住院时间和急诊部门的接诊阻塞,而不会增加再入院率,并提高患者和工作人员的满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验