Liperoti Rosa, Onder Graziano, Landi Francesco, Lapane Kate L, Mor Vincent, Bernabei Roberto, Gambassi Giovanni
Centro di Medicina dell'Invecchiamento, Dipartimento di Scienze Gerontologiche, Geriatriche e Fisiatriche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 8 0168 Rome, Italy.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;70(10):1340-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04597yel.
A recent meta-analysis has indicated that, in patients with dementia, the use of atypical antipsychotics is associated with an excess mortality. Later observational studies have suggested that conventional antipsychotics may pose an even greater risk of death. None of these studies could evaluate the risk associated with single antipsychotics nor could they provide any conclusive evidence concerning the risk among nursing home residents. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the risk of death associated with atypical and conventional antipsychotics in a large population of nursing home residents with dementia.
We identified 6,524 new users of atypical antipsychotics and 3,205 new users of conventional antipsychotics living in 1,581 Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing homes in 5 US states during the years 1998-2000. The outcome measure was all-cause mortality, which was determined during 6-months of follow-up.
After adjusting for potential confounders relative to users of atypicals, the rate of death was increased for users of conventional antipsychotics (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42). Relative to risperidone, a higher rate of death was documented for haloperidol (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.53), phenothiazines (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.38) and other conventional medications (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.99-1.80). No atypical antipsychotic was associated with a differential risk relative to risperidone.
Conventional antipsychotics are associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality than atypical agents. It seems advisable that they are not used in substitution for atypical antipsychotics among nursing home residents with dementia even when short-term therapy is being prescribed.
最近的一项荟萃分析表明,在痴呆患者中,使用非典型抗精神病药物与死亡率增加有关。后来的观察性研究表明,传统抗精神病药物可能带来更大的死亡风险。这些研究均无法评估单一抗精神病药物相关的风险,也无法提供关于疗养院居民中该风险的确凿证据。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以比较在大量患有痴呆症的疗养院居民中,非典型和传统抗精神病药物相关的死亡风险。
我们确定了1998年至2000年期间居住在美国5个州1581家获得医疗保险或医疗补助认证的疗养院中的6524名非典型抗精神病药物新使用者和3205名传统抗精神病药物新使用者。结局指标是全因死亡率,在6个月的随访期间确定。
在针对非典型药物使用者调整潜在混杂因素后,传统抗精神病药物使用者的死亡率有所增加(风险比[HR],1.26;95%置信区间,1.13 - 1.42)。相对于利培酮,氟哌啶醇(HR,1.31;95%置信区间,1.13 - 1.53)、吩噻嗪类药物(HR,1.17;95%置信区间,1.00 - 1.38)和其他传统药物(HR,1.32;95%置信区间,0.99 - 1.80)的死亡率更高。与利培酮相比,没有非典型抗精神病药物与不同的风险相关。
与非典型药物相比,传统抗精神病药物与全因死亡率较高相关。对于患有痴呆症的疗养院居民,即使是在进行短期治疗时,似乎也不宜用传统抗精神病药物替代非典型抗精神病药物。