Suppr超能文献

比较 13 种去头虱产品的功效和安全性的体外试验。

Comparative in vitro tests on the efficacy and safety of 13 anti-head-lice products.

机构信息

Department of Zoology and Parasitology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

Parasitol Res. 2010 Jan;106(2):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1680-x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

Abstract

Head lice are an emerging social problem, not only in economically poor countries but also in practically all other societies. Several of the common anti-louse products have lost--at least in part--their efficacy due to increasing resistance of lice against insecticides such as permethrin or allethrin. Other compounds, like lindan, were redrawn or banned due to high toxicity. Some recently developed products are based on dimethicones or cyclomethicones and turned out to be easily inflammable. Other styled medicinal products are based on plant extracts-some were proven of high efficacy-others of ineffectivity. The present study investigated in in vitro tests the anti-head louse efficacy of 13 products, the contents of which are used worldwide: Aesculo-Gel L, EtoPril, Goldgeist Forte, InfectoPedicul, Jacutin Pedicul Fluid, K.Laus, Liberalice, Licatack, Mosquito Läuse-Shampoo, Nyda, Paranix, Picksan Louse Stop, and Wash Away Louse. It turned out that several of them are easily inflammable, and therefore, they endanger users (InfectoPedicul, Paranix, EtoPril, Nyda, Goldgeist Forte, and K.Laus, see Table 1). Others have to remain for many hours on the hair in order to reach efficacy (Table 4). During such long periods, highly dosed oils may become inhaled and thus may become dangerous for the user's lung epithelia by covering them. When incubating the lice for 3 or 10 min in vitro, only the following products killed all lice exposed to these products: InfectoPedicul, Paranix, Jacutin Pedicul Fluid, Nyda, K.Laus, Picksan Louse Stop, Licatack, and Wash Away Louse. When evaluating the possible dangers for the users, the last three products, especially, derived from plant extracts, are safe and highly effective at the same time. Furthermore, they had been tested dermatologically as "very good".

摘要

头虱是一个新出现的社会问题,不仅在经济贫困的国家存在,在几乎所有其他社会也同样存在。几种常见的除虱产品由于虱子对杀虫剂(如氯菊酯或丙烯菊酯)的抗药性增强,其效果至少在一定程度上有所降低。其他化合物,如林丹,由于毒性高而被重新绘制或禁止使用。一些最近开发的产品基于二甲硅油或环甲硅油,结果证明很容易燃烧。其他样式的医药产品基于植物提取物-有些被证明具有高效-其他则无效。本研究在体外试验中研究了 13 种产品的抗头虱功效,这些产品的成分在全球范围内使用:Aesculo-Gel L、EtoPril、Goldgeist Forte、InfectoPedicul、Jacutin Pedicul Fluid、K.Laus、Liberalice、Licatack、Mosquito Läuse-Shampoo、Nyda、Paranix、Picksan Louse Stop 和 Wash Away Louse。结果表明,其中一些产品很容易燃烧,因此对使用者构成危险(InfectoPedicul、Paranix、EtoPril、Nyda、Goldgeist Forte 和 K.Laus,见表 1)。其他产品需要在头发上停留数小时才能达到疗效(表 4)。在如此长的时间内,高剂量的油可能会被吸入,从而通过覆盖使用者的肺上皮而对其肺部造成危险。当在体外孵育虱子 3 或 10 分钟时,只有以下产品杀死了暴露于这些产品的所有虱子:InfectoPedicul、Paranix、Jacutin Pedicul Fluid、Nyda、K.Laus、Picksan Louse Stop、Licatack 和 Wash Away Louse。在评估对使用者可能造成的危险时,特别是最后三种源自植物提取物的产品,既安全又高效。此外,它们已经过皮肤科测试,被评为“非常好”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验