USP Araba Sport Clinic, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2581-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bc1aac.
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of 2 in-season short-term sprint and power training protocols on vertical countermovement jump height (with or without arms), sprint (Sprint-15m) speed, and agility (Agility-15m) speed in male elite junior soccer players. Twenty highly trained soccer players (age 18.3 +/- 0.6 years, height 177 +/- 4 cm, body mass 71.4 +/- 6.9 kg, sum skinfolds 48.1 +/- 11.4 mm), members of a professional soccer academy, were randomly allocated to either a CONTRAST (n = 10) or SPRINT (n = 10) group. The training intervention consisted of 6 supervised training sessions over 7 weeks, targeting the improvement of the players' speed and power. CONTRAST protocol consisted of alternating heavy-light resistance (15-50% body mass) with soccer-specific drills (small-sided games or technical skills). SPRINT training protocol used line 30-m sprints (2-4 sets of 4 x 30 m with 180 and 90 seconds of recovery, respectively). At baseline no difference between physical test performance was evident between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). No time x training group effect was found for any of the vertical jump and Agility-15m variables (p > 0.05). A time x training group effect was found for Sprint-15m performance with the CONTRAST group showing significantly better scores than the SPRINT group (7.23 +/- 0.18 vs. 7.09 +/- 0.20 m.s, p < 0.01). In light of these findings CONTRAST training should be preferred to line sprint training in the short term in young elite soccer players when the aim is to improve soccer-specific sprint performance (15 m) during the competitive season.
本研究旨在考察两种赛季内短期冲刺和力量训练方案对 10 名高水平男性青年精英足球运动员垂直纵跳高度(带或不带手臂)、冲刺(15 米冲刺)速度和敏捷性(15 米敏捷性)速度的影响。这些足球运动员均来自一家专业足球学院,他们被随机分配到对比组(n = 10)或冲刺组(n = 10)。训练干预包括 6 节监督训练课,持续 7 周,旨在提高运动员的速度和力量。对比方案包括交替进行重轻阻力(15-50%体重)和足球专项训练(小场比赛或技术技能)。冲刺训练方案使用 30 米直线冲刺(2-4 组 4 x 30 m,分别恢复 180 秒和 90 秒)。在基线时,两组之间的体能测试表现没有差异(p > 0.05)。垂直跳和 15 米敏捷性变量没有时间 x 训练组效应(p > 0.05)。15 米冲刺表现有时间 x 训练组效应,对比组的得分明显优于冲刺组(7.23 +/- 0.18 vs. 7.09 +/- 0.20 m.s,p < 0.01)。鉴于这些发现,当目标是在竞争赛季中提高足球专项冲刺表现(15 米)时,应在短期内优先选择对比训练而不是直线冲刺训练,以提高年轻精英足球运动员的速度。