• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的分期系统比传统的分期系统更能区分不可切除的肝细胞癌。

A new staging system is more discriminant than conventional staging systems for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 730050 Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;136(6):821-7. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0722-1. Epub 2009 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-009-0722-1
PMID:19916022
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prediction of the life expectancy of a patient with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains difficult. The aims of the study were to construct a new staging scheme for patients with unresectable HCC and to compare the discriminatory ability of the staging scheme with the Okuda and CLIP score and TNM staging system in a cohort of patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of unresectable HCC cases from 1999 to 2003 was performed. The Cox model was used for multivariate analyses. The final model was derived from 10 randomly chosen training samples and the prognostic validity of the new staging scheme was assessed on the corresponding testing samples. Moreover, 54 cases with unresectable HCC were enrolled and prospectively followed up. The new staging, named the China integrated score (CIS), Okuda, TNM and CLIP systems were determined for each case. Comparisons of the survival rate between each stage were performed to evaluate their discriminatory ability.

RESULTS

A simple scoring system was constructed, assigning linear scores (0/1/2) to the three covariates (TNM, alpha-fetoprotein and Child-Pugh) of the final model. The CIS system was more discriminant than the Okuda or TNM staging system, as confirmed by the Kaplan-Meier comparison of survival curves and by the Cox's regression analysis, with a median survival rate of 9.0, 2.3, 2.1 and 0.6 months in patients with CIS 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The CIS system was performed as well as the CLIP score.

CONCLUSION

The new staging system, accounting for both liver function and tumor characteristics, can accurately identify patients with different prognoses, particularly in the advanced phases of HCC. It should be useful as the only tool that can be applied for patients with unresectable HCC.

摘要

背景

预测不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的预期寿命仍然很困难。本研究的目的是为不可切除 HCC 患者构建一种新的分期方案,并在不可切除 HCC 患者队列中比较该分期方案与 Okuda 和 CLIP 评分及 TNM 分期系统的鉴别能力。

方法

回顾性分析了 1999 年至 2003 年不可切除 HCC 病例。采用 Cox 模型进行多变量分析。最终模型由 10 个随机选择的训练样本得出,新分期方案的预后有效性在相应的测试样本中进行评估。此外,纳入了 54 例不可切除 HCC 患者,并前瞻性随访。为每个病例确定了新分期(命名为中国综合评分[CIS])、Okuda、TNM 和 CLIP 系统。比较每个分期的生存率以评估其鉴别能力。

结果

构建了一个简单的评分系统,将最终模型的三个协变量(TNM、甲胎蛋白和 Child-Pugh)的线性评分(0/1/2)分配给该评分系统。CIS 系统比 Okuda 或 TNM 分期系统更具鉴别能力,这通过生存曲线的 Kaplan-Meier 比较和 Cox 回归分析得到了证实,CIS 2、3、4 和 5 期患者的中位生存时间分别为 9.0、2.3、2.1 和 0.6 个月。CIS 系统的表现与 CLIP 评分相当。

结论

该新分期系统考虑了肝功能和肿瘤特征,能够准确识别具有不同预后的患者,尤其是在 HCC 的晚期阶段。它应该是一种有用的工具,可作为唯一适用于不可切除 HCC 患者的工具。

相似文献

1
A new staging system is more discriminant than conventional staging systems for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.新的分期系统比传统的分期系统更能区分不可切除的肝细胞癌。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;136(6):821-7. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0722-1. Epub 2009 Nov 15.
2
A new staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with six existing staging systems in a large Chinese cohort.一种新的可切除肝细胞癌分期系统:与中国大样本队列中 6 种现有分期系统的比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 May;137(5):739-50. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0935-3. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
A modified TNM-7 staging system to better predict the survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.改良的 TNM-7 分期系统可更好地预测肝癌患者肝切除术后的生存情况。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct;139(10):1709-19. doi: 10.1007/s00432-013-1497-y. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
6
LAPTM4B-35 overexpression is a risk factor for tumor recurrence and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.LAPTM4B-35 过表达是肝癌肿瘤复发和预后不良的危险因素。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb;136(2):275-81. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0659-4. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
7
Sequencing of systemic therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.系统治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的序贯治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024 Dec;204:104522. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104522. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
8
Identification of Patients with Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Benefiting from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-A SEER-Based Study.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库研究:识别从新辅助化疗中获益的早期肝细胞癌患者
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 29;56(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01264-2.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Analysis of factors influencing tumor volume doubling time in hepatocellular carcinoma and its predictive value for progression-free survival.肝细胞癌肿瘤体积倍增时间的影响因素分析及其对无进展生存期的预测价值
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06349-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Favorable Prognostic Factors for Survival Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis After Hepatectomy.肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者术后生存结局的有利预后因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4279-4289. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13316-7. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
Development and Validation of Artificial Neural Networks for Survival Prediction Model for Patients with Spontaneous Hepatocellular Carcinoma Rupture After Transcatheter Arterial Embolization.经导管动脉栓塞术后自发性肝细胞癌破裂患者生存预测模型的人工神经网络开发与验证
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Sep 27;13:7463-7477. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S328307. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Current management of hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的当前管理
Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jul;93(4):885-900, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2009.03.004.
2
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的管理
Minerva Med. 2009 Feb;100(1):51-68.
3
Comprehensive analysis of the alpha-fetoprotein-specific CD8+ T cell responses in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌患者中α-甲胎蛋白特异性CD8 + T细胞反应的综合分析。
Validation and ranking of seven staging systems of hepatocellular carcinoma.
肝细胞癌七种分期系统的验证与排名
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jul;14(1):705-714. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6222. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.肝细胞癌的分期系统:现状与未来展望
World J Hepatol. 2015 Mar 27;7(3):406-24. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.406.
5
Prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of seven staging systems (TNM, Okuda, BCLC, CLIP, CUPI, JIS, CIS) in a Chinese cohort.不可切除肝细胞癌的预后:中国队列中七种分期系统(TNM、奥田、巴塞罗那临床肝癌、CLIP、CUPI、日本综合分期系统、CIS)的比较
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e88182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088182. eCollection 2014.
6
Predictive biomarkers of antiangiogenic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: where are we?晚期肝细胞癌抗血管生成治疗的预测性生物标志物:我们进展到哪一步了?
Liver Cancer. 2013 Apr;2(2):93-107. doi: 10.1159/000343845.
7
Prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients enrolled in clinical trials can be classified by current staging systems.目前的分期系统可对入组临床试验的晚期肝细胞癌患者的预后进行分类。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Nov 6;107(10):1672-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.466. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Hepatology. 2008 Dec;48(6):1821-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.22535.
4
A new prognostic score system in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not amendable to locoregional therapy: implication for patient selection in systemic therapy trials.一种针对无法接受局部区域治疗的晚期肝细胞癌患者的新预后评分系统:对全身治疗试验患者选择的意义。
Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;113(10):2742-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23878.
5
A new prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: value of the biomarker combined Japan integrated staging score.一种新的肝细胞癌预后分期系统:生物标志物联合日本综合分期评分的价值
Intervirology. 2008;51 Suppl 1:86-94. doi: 10.1159/000122599. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
6
A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma including recurrent cases: a study of 861 patients in a single institution.一种包括复发病例的肝细胞癌新预后系统:对单一机构861例患者的研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;42(3):317-22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3180ebe790.
7
Comparison of 7 staging systems for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.接受经动脉化疗栓塞术的肝细胞癌患者的7种分期系统比较。
Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;112(2):352-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23185.
8
Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score for staging hepatocellular carcinoma.肝癌意大利研究组(CLIP)评分用于分期肝细胞癌。
Hepatol Res. 2007 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S206-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00186.x.
9
Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的预后
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jan-Feb;49(43):7-11.
10
How should patients with hepatocellular carcinoma be staged? Validation of a new prognostic system.肝细胞癌患者应如何分期?一种新的预后系统的验证。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11):2266-73.