Futures Institute, 41-A New London Tpke, Glastonbury, CT 06033, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 18;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-S1-S4.
How should HIV and AIDS resources be allocated to achieve the greatest possible impact? This paper begins with a theoretical discussion of this issue, describing the key elements of an "evidence-based allocation strategy". While it is noted that the quality of epidemiological and economic data remains inadequate to define such an optimal strategy, there do exist tools and research which can lead countries in a way that they can make allocation decisions. Furthermore, there are clear indications that most countries are not allocating their HIV and AIDS resources in a way which is likely to achieve the greatest possible impact. For example, it is noted that neighboring countries, even when they have a similar prevalence of HIV, nonetheless often allocate their resources in radically different ways. These differing allocation patterns appear to be attributable to a number of different issues, including a lack of data, contradictory results in existing data, a need for overemphasizing a multisectoral response, a lack of political will, a general inefficiency in the use of resources when they do get allocated, poor planning and a lack of control over the way resources get allocated.
There are a number of tools currently available which can improve the resource-allocation process. Tools such as the Resource Needs Model (RNM) can provide policymakers with a clearer idea of resource requirements, whereas other tools such as Goals and the Allocation by Cost-Effectiveness (ABCE) models can provide countries with a clearer vision of how they might reallocate funds.
Examples from nine different countries provide information about how policymakers are trying to make their resource-allocation strategies more "evidence based". By identifying the challenges and successes of these nine countries in making more informed allocation decisions, it is hoped that future resource-allocation decisions for all countries can be improved.
We discuss the future of resource allocation, noting the types of additional data which will be required and the improvements in existing tools which could be made.
如何分配艾滋病毒和艾滋病资源才能产生最大影响?本文首先从理论上讨论了这个问题,描述了“基于证据的分配策略”的关键要素。虽然现有的流行病学和经济数据的质量仍然不足以确定这样的最佳策略,但确实存在一些工具和研究,可以为各国指明方向,使它们能够做出资源分配决策。此外,有明确的迹象表明,大多数国家没有以可能产生最大影响的方式分配艾滋病毒和艾滋病资源。例如,有人指出,即使邻国的艾滋病毒流行率相似,但它们的资源分配方式却大相径庭。这些不同的分配模式似乎归因于许多不同的问题,包括缺乏数据、现有数据中的矛盾结果、过分强调多部门应对的需要、缺乏政治意愿、资源分配后普遍存在的资源利用效率低下、规划不善以及对资源分配方式缺乏控制。
目前有许多工具可以改进资源分配过程。资源需求模型 (RNM) 等工具可以为政策制定者提供更清晰的资源需求概念,而目标和按成本效益分配 (ABCE) 等其他工具可以为各国提供更清晰的思路,了解如何重新分配资金。
来自九个不同国家的例子提供了有关政策制定者如何试图使资源分配策略更“基于证据”的信息。通过确定这九个国家在做出更明智的分配决策方面的挑战和成功,希望可以改进所有国家未来的资源分配决策。
我们讨论了资源分配的未来,指出了所需的额外数据类型以及可以改进的现有工具。