• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者和外部评定量表在多发性硬化症中的反应性:三种临床环境下的头对头比较。

Responsiveness of patient-based and external rating scales in multiple sclerosis: head-to-head comparison in three clinical settings.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2010 Mar 15;290(1-2):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2009.10.020
PMID:19922955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-based rating scales and especially quality of life scales have received increasing attention as secondary outcome measures in multiple sclerosis (MS). Responsiveness to health-related change of quality of life scales is thus an important property when these measures are to be used successfully in clinical trials.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of 3 cohorts of MS patients to examine responsiveness of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire for Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS). One cohort consisted of patients from the outpatient clinic whose overall health status deteriorated over the course of one year (n=53), one study investigated two neurorehabilitation programs (n=20 each) and a third study investigated a low-level aerobic fitness training intervention (n=15).

RESULTS

The total score of the HAQUAMS and several subscales was found to be responsive in all three settings. In addition, we provide minimally important difference (MID) estimates based on anchor- and distribution-based methods for all scales of the HAQUAMS.

CONCLUSIONS

The HAQUAMS is responsive to change in observational and intervention studies in MS in adequately powered trials.

摘要

背景

基于患者的评分量表,特别是生活质量量表,作为多发性硬化症(MS)的次要结局测量指标,已经受到越来越多的关注。因此,当这些测量指标成功应用于临床试验时,对生活质量量表与健康相关的变化的反应能力是一个重要的特性。

方法

我们对 3 组 MS 患者进行了分析,以检查汉堡多发性硬化症生活质量问卷(HAQUAMS)的反应能力。一个队列由门诊患者组成,他们的整体健康状况在一年中恶化(n=53),一项研究调查了两个神经康复项目(n=20 人),第三个研究调查了低水平的有氧运动训练干预(n=15)。

结果

HAQUAMS 的总分和几个分量表在所有三种情况下都具有反应能力。此外,我们还基于锚定和分布方法为 HAQUAMS 的所有量表提供了最小重要差异(MID)估计。

结论

在多发性硬化症的观察性和干预性研究中,HAQUAMS 在充分有力的试验中对变化具有反应能力。

相似文献

1
Responsiveness of patient-based and external rating scales in multiple sclerosis: head-to-head comparison in three clinical settings.基于患者和外部评定量表在多发性硬化症中的反应性:三种临床环境下的头对头比较。
J Neurol Sci. 2010 Mar 15;290(1-2):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
2
Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者报告结局测量的比较。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Aug;128(2):114-21. doi: 10.1111/ane.12083. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
3
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
4
A longitudinal survey of self-assessed health trends in a community cohort of people with multiple sclerosis and their significant others.对多发性硬化症患者及其重要他人的社区队列中自我评估健康趋势的纵向调查。
J Neurol Sci. 2006 Apr 15;243(1-2):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2005.11.005. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
5
Assessing responsiveness of generic and specific health related quality of life measures in heart failure.评估心力衰竭中通用和特定健康相关生活质量测量指标的反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Nov 24;4:89. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-89.
6
The responsiveness of health status measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of disease-specific and generic instruments.类风湿关节炎患者健康状况测量指标的反应性:疾病特异性和通用工具的比较
J Rheumatol. 1999 Jul;26(7):1474-80.
7
Patient-reported questionnaires in MS rehabilitation: responsiveness and minimal important difference of the multiple sclerosis questionnaire for physiotherapists (MSQPT).多发性硬化症康复中患者报告的问卷:物理治疗师多发性硬化症问卷(MSQPT)的反应度和最小重要差异
BMC Neurol. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0834-1.
8
Effectiveness of applying progressive muscle relaxation technique on quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis.应用渐进性肌肉松弛技术对多发性硬化症患者生活质量的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Aug;18(15):2171-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02787.x.
9
Quality of life is favorable for most patients with multiple sclerosis: a population-based cohort study.大多数多发性硬化症患者的生活质量良好:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Arch Neurol. 2004 May;61(5):679-86. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.5.679.
10
Impact of aerobic training on immune-endocrine parameters, neurotrophic factors, quality of life and coordinative function in multiple sclerosis.有氧运动训练对多发性硬化症患者免疫内分泌参数、神经营养因子、生活质量及协调功能的影响
J Neurol Sci. 2004 Oct 15;225(1-2):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.06.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a digital lifestyle management intervention (levidex) to improve quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized controlled trial.数字生活方式管理干预(levidex)对改善多发性硬化症患者生活质量的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03843-5.
2
Progression events defined by home-based assessment of motor function in multiple sclerosis: protocol of a prospective study.基于家庭的多发性硬化症运动功能评估所定义的病情进展事件:一项前瞻性研究方案
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 10;14:1258635. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1258635. eCollection 2023.
3
Patient-Reported Questionnaires in Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference of the French Version of the Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire for Physiotherapists.
多发性硬化症康复中的患者报告问卷:物理治疗师版法语多发性硬化症问卷的反应度和最小重要差异
Physiother Can. 2021 Summer;73(3):226-234. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2019-0096.
4
Impairment and restrictions in possibly benign multiple sclerosis.可能良性多发性硬化症中的障碍和限制。
Brain Behav. 2019 Apr;9(4):e01259. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1259. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
Multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Nov 8;4(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0041-4.
6
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Impact of Disease-Modifying Drugs.多发性硬化症患者的健康相关生活质量:疾病修正药物的影响。
CNS Drugs. 2017 Jul;31(7):585-602. doi: 10.1007/s40263-017-0444-x.
7
Patient-reported questionnaires in MS rehabilitation: responsiveness and minimal important difference of the multiple sclerosis questionnaire for physiotherapists (MSQPT).多发性硬化症康复中患者报告的问卷:物理治疗师多发性硬化症问卷(MSQPT)的反应度和最小重要差异
BMC Neurol. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0834-1.
8
Patient reported outcome measures in neurogenic bladder.神经源性膀胱的患者报告结局指标
Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Feb;5(1):22-30. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.12.05.
9
Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire to disability change: a longitudinal study.多发性硬化症国际生活质量问卷对残疾变化的反应:一项纵向研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 29;11:127. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-127.
10
Measuring the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: a necessary challenge.在临床实践中测量多发性硬化症患者的生活质量:一项必要的挑战。
Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:524894. doi: 10.1155/2013/524894. Epub 2013 Feb 28.