Yeung Nick, Nieuwenhuis Sander
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14506-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-09.2009.
Neuroimaging studies consistently report activity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in conditions of high cognitive demand, leading to the view that ACC plays a crucial role in the control of cognitive processes. According to one prominent theory, the sensitivity of ACC to task difficulty reflects its role in monitoring for the occurrence of competition, or "conflict," between responses to signal the need for increased cognitive control. However, a contrasting theory proposes that ACC is the recipient rather than source of monitoring signals, and that ACC activity observed in relation to task demand reflects the role of this region in learning about the likelihood of errors. Response conflict and error likelihood are typically confounded, making the theories difficult to distinguish empirically. The present research therefore used detailed computational simulations to derive contrasting predictions regarding ACC activity and error rate as a function of response speed. The simulations demonstrated a clear dissociation between conflict and error likelihood: fast response trials are associated with low conflict but high error likelihood, whereas slow response trials show the opposite pattern. Using the N2 component as an index of ACC activity, an EEG study demonstrated that when conflict and error likelihood are dissociated in this way, ACC activity tracks conflict and is negatively correlated with error likelihood. These findings support the conflict-monitoring theory and suggest that, in speeded decision tasks, ACC activity reflects current task demands rather than the retrospective coding of past performance.
神经影像学研究一致报告称,在认知需求较高的情况下,前扣带回皮质(ACC)会出现活动,这使得人们认为ACC在认知过程的控制中起着关键作用。根据一种著名的理论,ACC对任务难度的敏感性反映了它在监测反应之间竞争或“冲突”的发生情况,以表明需要增强认知控制。然而,一种相反的理论提出,ACC是监测信号的接收者而非来源,并且与任务需求相关的ACC活动反映了该区域在了解错误可能性方面的作用。反应冲突和错误可能性通常相互混淆,使得这些理论难以通过实证进行区分。因此,本研究使用详细的计算模拟来得出关于ACC活动和错误率作为反应速度函数的对比预测。模拟结果表明冲突和错误可能性之间存在明显的分离:快速反应试验与低冲突但高错误可能性相关,而缓慢反应试验则呈现相反的模式。使用N2成分作为ACC活动的指标,一项脑电图研究表明,当以这种方式分离冲突和错误可能性时,ACC活动跟踪冲突并且与错误可能性呈负相关。这些发现支持了冲突监测理论,并表明在快速决策任务中,ACC活动反映了当前的任务需求,而不是对过去表现的回顾性编码。