• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Dissociating response conflict and error likelihood in anterior cingulate cortex.区分前扣带回皮层中的反应冲突和错误可能性。
J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14506-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-09.2009.
2
Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood.前扣带皮层中的预期活动可以独立于冲突和错误可能性。
J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 30;28(18):4671-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4400-07.2008.
3
A computational model of risk, conflict, and individual difference effects in the anterior cingulate cortex.前扣带回皮质中风险、冲突及个体差异效应的计算模型
Brain Res. 2008 Apr 2;1202:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.080. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
4
Conflict effects without conflict in anterior cingulate cortex: multiple response effects and context specific representations.前扣带回皮质中无冲突时的冲突效应:多种反应效应及情境特异性表征
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 1;47(1):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.034. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
5
The relationship between reaction time, error rate and anterior cingulate cortex activity.反应时间、错误率与前扣带回皮质活动之间的关系。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Feb;47(2):175-83. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00125-3.
6
Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.绩效监测的子过程:事件相关功能磁共振成像和事件相关电位揭示的错误处理与反应竞争的分离
Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1387-401. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0935.
7
Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex.前扣带回皮质中对错误可能性的习得性预测。
Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1118-21. doi: 10.1126/science.1105783.
8
The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex.前扣带皮层中动作监测过程的时间安排。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):593-602. doi: 10.1162/08989290260045837.
9
Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors.前扣带回皮质与反应冲突:频率、抑制和错误的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):825-36. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.9.825.
10
Errors without conflict: implications for performance monitoring theories of anterior cingulate cortex.无冲突错误:对前扣带回皮质性能监测理论的启示
Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):267-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.007.

引用本文的文献

1
The list-wide proportion congruency effect is larger when the distractor precedes the target: Evidence for conflict-independent control in the prime-probe task.当干扰项先于目标出现时,列表范围内的比例一致性效应更大:启动-探测任务中冲突独立控制的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01669-7.
2
Cumulative trauma load and timing of trauma prior to military deployment differentially influences inhibitory control processing across deployment.在军事部署前,累积性创伤负荷和创伤时间的不同会对部署期间的抑制控制处理产生影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):21414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48505-7.
3
Debates on the dorsomedial prefrontal/dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: insights for future research.关于背内侧前额叶/背侧前扣带回的争论:对未来研究的启示。
Brain. 2023 Dec 1;146(12):4826-4844. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad263.
4
Understanding cingulotomy's therapeutic effect in OCD through computer models.通过计算机模型理解扣带束切开术在强迫症中的治疗效果。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2023 Jan 10;16:889831. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.889831. eCollection 2022.
5
Bilingualism can cause enhanced monitoring and occasional delayed responses in a flanker task.双语能力可能在侧抑制任务中引起增强的监控和偶尔的延迟反应。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Jan;57(1):129-147. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15863. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Concurrent working memory task increases or decreases the flanker-related N2 amplitude.同时进行的工作记忆任务会增加或降低侧翼相关N2波幅。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:962153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962153. eCollection 2022.
7
Filling the gaps: Cognitive control as a critical lens for understanding mechanisms of value-based decision-making.填补空白:认知控制作为理解基于价值的决策机制的关键视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Mar;134:104483. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
8
Can the Stroop effect serve as the gold standard of conflict monitoring and control? A conceptual critique.Stroop 效应能否作为冲突监测和控制的金标准?概念批判。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jul;50(5):883-897. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01251-5. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world environments.比较虚拟环境与真实世界环境中认知测试期间的生理反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89297-y.
10
Fast fronto-parietal cortical dynamics of conflict detection and context updating in a flanker task.侧翼任务中冲突检测与情境更新的快速额顶叶皮质动力学
Cogn Neurodyn. 2020 Dec;14(6):795-814. doi: 10.1007/s11571-020-09628-z. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflict effects without conflict in anterior cingulate cortex: multiple response effects and context specific representations.前扣带回皮质中无冲突时的冲突效应:多种反应效应及情境特异性表征
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 1;47(1):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.034. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
2
Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function.冲突监测与决策:调和对前扣带回功能的两种观点。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.4.356.
3
Risk prediction and aversion by anterior cingulate cortex.前扣带回皮质对风险的预测与规避
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):266-77. doi: 10.3758/cabn.7.4.266.
4
The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring. Predictable dissociations between the error-related negativity and N2.认知缺陷对冲突监测的影响。错误相关负波与N2之间可预测的分离。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01680.x.
5
Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex.前扣带回皮质中对错误可能性的习得性预测。
Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1118-21. doi: 10.1126/science.1105783.
6
Responses of human anterior cingulate cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting.人类前扣带回皮质微区对错误检测、冲突监测、刺激-反应映射、熟悉度和定向的反应。
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 19;25(3):604-13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4151-04.2005.
7
The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity.错误检测的神经基础:冲突监测与错误相关负波。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.939.
8
Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质中的动作集与决策
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Sep;8(9):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.009.
9
Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.前扣带回在控制中的冲突监测与调整。
Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1089910.
10
Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.“是/否”任务中前扣带回功能的电生理相关性:反应冲突和试验类型频率的影响
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Mar;3(1):17-26. doi: 10.3758/cabn.3.1.17.

区分前扣带回皮层中的反应冲突和错误可能性。

Dissociating response conflict and error likelihood in anterior cingulate cortex.

作者信息

Yeung Nick, Nieuwenhuis Sander

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14506-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-09.2009.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-09.2009
PMID:19923284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2831178/
Abstract

Neuroimaging studies consistently report activity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in conditions of high cognitive demand, leading to the view that ACC plays a crucial role in the control of cognitive processes. According to one prominent theory, the sensitivity of ACC to task difficulty reflects its role in monitoring for the occurrence of competition, or "conflict," between responses to signal the need for increased cognitive control. However, a contrasting theory proposes that ACC is the recipient rather than source of monitoring signals, and that ACC activity observed in relation to task demand reflects the role of this region in learning about the likelihood of errors. Response conflict and error likelihood are typically confounded, making the theories difficult to distinguish empirically. The present research therefore used detailed computational simulations to derive contrasting predictions regarding ACC activity and error rate as a function of response speed. The simulations demonstrated a clear dissociation between conflict and error likelihood: fast response trials are associated with low conflict but high error likelihood, whereas slow response trials show the opposite pattern. Using the N2 component as an index of ACC activity, an EEG study demonstrated that when conflict and error likelihood are dissociated in this way, ACC activity tracks conflict and is negatively correlated with error likelihood. These findings support the conflict-monitoring theory and suggest that, in speeded decision tasks, ACC activity reflects current task demands rather than the retrospective coding of past performance.

摘要

神经影像学研究一致报告称,在认知需求较高的情况下,前扣带回皮质(ACC)会出现活动,这使得人们认为ACC在认知过程的控制中起着关键作用。根据一种著名的理论,ACC对任务难度的敏感性反映了它在监测反应之间竞争或“冲突”的发生情况,以表明需要增强认知控制。然而,一种相反的理论提出,ACC是监测信号的接收者而非来源,并且与任务需求相关的ACC活动反映了该区域在了解错误可能性方面的作用。反应冲突和错误可能性通常相互混淆,使得这些理论难以通过实证进行区分。因此,本研究使用详细的计算模拟来得出关于ACC活动和错误率作为反应速度函数的对比预测。模拟结果表明冲突和错误可能性之间存在明显的分离:快速反应试验与低冲突但高错误可能性相关,而缓慢反应试验则呈现相反的模式。使用N2成分作为ACC活动的指标,一项脑电图研究表明,当以这种方式分离冲突和错误可能性时,ACC活动跟踪冲突并且与错误可能性呈负相关。这些发现支持了冲突监测理论,并表明在快速决策任务中,ACC活动反映了当前的任务需求,而不是对过去表现的回顾性编码。