Sammaritano M, Gigli G L, Gotman J
Montreal Neurological Institute, PQ, Canada.
Neurology. 1991 Feb;41(2 ( Pt 1)):290-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.2_part_1.290.
We examined variations in interictal spiking during sleep and wakefulness to assess differences in reliability for localizing epileptic foci. Forty patients were studied prospectively. Spikes were assessed for rates, field, and appearance of new foci. Final localization was determined by surgery, electrocorticography, and seizure onset. Comparison of interictal EEG foci with final localization was made. In 39 patients, slow-wave sleep activated spiking compared with wakefulness. Most patients showed maximal spiking in sleep stages 3 or 4. Restriction of field in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and wakefulness, and extension of field in slow-wave sleep occurred. New foci appeared in non-rapid eye movement sleep in 53% of patients. Similar but not identical spiking rates, foci, and field distributions were seen in wakefulness and REM sleep. All REM foci were unilateral. Our findings suggest that localization of the primary epileptogenic area is more reliable in REM sleep than in wakefulness, and in wakefulness more than in slow-wave sleep.
我们检查了睡眠和清醒期间发作间期棘波的变化,以评估癫痫病灶定位可靠性的差异。对40例患者进行了前瞻性研究。评估棘波的发生率、范围及新病灶的出现情况。最终定位通过手术、皮质脑电图和癫痫发作起始来确定。将发作间期脑电图病灶与最终定位进行比较。在39例患者中,与清醒相比,慢波睡眠激活了棘波。大多数患者在睡眠3期或4期棘波最多。快速眼动(REM)睡眠和清醒时棘波范围受限,慢波睡眠时棘波范围扩大。53%的患者在非快速眼动睡眠中出现新病灶。清醒和REM睡眠中可见相似但不完全相同的棘波发生率、病灶及范围分布。所有REM病灶均为单侧。我们的研究结果表明,原发性致痫区在REM睡眠中的定位比清醒时更可靠,在清醒时比慢波睡眠更可靠。