Suppr超能文献

荷兰产科系统的成本分析:倾向于在家分娩或短期住院分娩的低风险初产妇——一项前瞻性非随机对照研究。

Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.

作者信息

Hendrix Marijke Jc, Evers Silvia Maa, Basten Marloes Cm, Nijhuis Jan G, Severens Johan L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, GROW - School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht UMC, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Nov 19;9:211. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-211.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, pregnant women without medical complications can decide where they want to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting with a midwife. However, a decrease in the home birth rate during the last decennium may have raised the societal costs of giving birth. The objective of this study is to compare the societal costs of home births with those of births in a short-stay hospital setting.

METHODS

This study is a cost analysis based on the findings of a multicenter prospective non-randomised study comparing two groups of nulliparous women with different preferences for where to give birth, at home or in a short-stay hospital setting. Data were collected using cost diaries, questionnaires and birth registration forms. Analysis of the data is divided into a base case analysis and a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

In the group of home births, the total societal costs associated with giving birth at home were euro3,695 (per birth), compared with euro3,950 per birth in the group for short-stay hospital births. Statistically significant differences between both groups were found regarding the following cost categories 'Cost of contacts with health care professionals during delivery' (euro138.38 vs. euro87.94, -50 (2.5-97.5 percentile range (PR)-76;-25), p < 0.05), 'cost of maternity care at home' (euro1,551.69 vs. euro1,240.69, -311 (PR -485; -150), p < 0.05) and 'cost of hospitalisation mother' (euro707.77 vs. 959.06, 251 (PR 69;433), p < 0.05). The highest costs are for hospitalisation (41% of all costs). Because there is a relatively high amount of (partly) missing data, a sensitivity analysis was performed, in which all missing data were included in the analysis by means of general mean substitution. In the sensitivity analysis, the total costs associated with home birth are euro4,364 per birth, and euro4,541 per birth for short-stay hospital births.

CONCLUSION

The total costs associated with pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care are comparable for home birth and short-stay hospital birth. The most important differences in costs between the home birth group and the short-stay hospital birth group are associated with maternity care assistance, hospitalisation, and travelling costs.

摘要

背景

在荷兰,没有医疗并发症的孕妇可以决定她们希望在哪里分娩,在家中或在有助产士的短期住院环境中。然而,在过去十年中家庭分娩率的下降可能增加了分娩的社会成本。本研究的目的是比较家庭分娩与短期住院分娩的社会成本。

方法

本研究是一项成本分析,基于一项多中心前瞻性非随机研究的结果,该研究比较了两组对分娩地点有不同偏好的初产妇,即在家中或在短期住院环境中。使用成本日记、问卷和出生登记表收集数据。数据分析分为基础案例分析和敏感性分析。

结果

在家分娩组中,在家分娩的总社会成本为每例3695欧元,而短期住院分娩组为每例3950欧元。两组在以下成本类别上存在统计学显著差异:“分娩期间与医护人员接触的成本”(138.38欧元对87.94欧元,-50(2.5-97.5百分位数范围(PR)-76;-25),p<0.05)、“在家中产妇护理成本”(1551.69欧元对1240.69欧元,-311(PR -485;-150),p<0.05)和“母亲住院成本”(707.77欧元对959.06欧元,251(PR 69;433),p<0.05)。最高成本是住院费用(占所有成本的41%)。由于存在相对大量的(部分)缺失数据,进行了敏感性分析,其中所有缺失数据通过一般均值替代法纳入分析。在敏感性分析中,家庭分娩的总成本为每例4364欧元,短期住院分娩为每例4541欧元。

结论

家庭分娩和短期住院分娩在妊娠、分娩和产后护理方面的总成本相当。家庭分娩组和短期住院分娩组在成本上的最重要差异与产妇护理协助、住院和交通成本有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b376/2784768/af9cde5e8fb8/1472-6963-9-211-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验