Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者非精神病性一级亲属的神经软体征:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Neurological soft signs in non-psychotic first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neurosciences Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4A Datun Road, Beijing 100101, China.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):889-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.012. Epub 2009 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurological soft signs (NSS) have been associated with the neuropsychopathology of schizophrenia, and have been proposed as candidate endophenotypes for this clinical group. However, the prevalence rate of NSS in non-psychotic first-degree relatives is not fully known. The authors systematically and quantitatively reviewed the literature to determine the magnitude of difference between: (1) first-degree non-psychotic relatives of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls, and (2) between schizophrenia patients and their non-psychotic relatives.

METHODS

An article search and meta-analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software package to quantify group differences. Mean effect sizes (standardized group mean differences) and associated confidence intervals along with homogeneity and publication bias tests and statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

Search procedures identified 11 independent studies that met the inclusion criteria. Quantification of NSS differences yielded a mean effect size of 0.81 for schizophrenia patients and their non-psychotic relatives and 0.97 for non-psychotic relatives of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings show that there are large group differences in NSS prevalence between patients with schizophrenia, non-psychotic relatives, and healthy controls. These results are consistent with the argument that NSS are familial in nature, segregate with the illness and may be valid and useful endophenotypes.

摘要

背景

神经学软体征(NSS)与精神分裂症的神经精神病理学有关,并被提议作为该临床群体的候选内表型。然而,非精神病性一级亲属中 NSS 的患病率尚不完全清楚。作者系统地和定量地审查了文献,以确定以下两组之间的差异幅度:(1)精神分裂症患者的一级非精神病亲属和健康对照组,以及(2)精神分裂症患者与其非精神病亲属之间。

方法

使用 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 软件包进行文章搜索和荟萃分析,以量化组间差异。计算了平均效应大小(标准化组均数差异)及其相关置信区间,以及同质性和发表偏倚检验和统计数据。

结果

搜索程序确定了 11 项符合纳入标准的独立研究。NSS 差异的量化得出了 0.81 的平均效应大小,用于精神分裂症患者及其非精神病亲属,以及用于精神分裂症患者的非精神病亲属和健康对照组的 0.97。

结论

目前的研究结果表明,精神分裂症患者、非精神病亲属和健康对照组之间 NSS 患病率存在很大的组间差异。这些结果与 NSS 具有家族性、与疾病分离以及可能是有效和有用的内表型的论点一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验