• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同大鼠器官对某些脯氨酰羟化酶活性刺激物的不同反应。

Different responses to some stimulators of prolyl hydroxylase activities in various rat organs.

作者信息

Takeda K, Kawai S, Tetsuka T, Konno K

出版信息

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Oct 13;484(2):301-6. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(77)90086-9.

DOI:10.1016/0005-2744(77)90086-9
PMID:199260
Abstract

Prolyl hydroxylase (proline,2-oxoglutarate dioxygenase, EC 1.14.11.2) of soluble fraction (105 000 X g supernatant) of rat granulation tissues was markedly enhanced by addition of nucleoside triphosphates to the assay medium. But the stimulatory activities of nucleoside triphosphates were very different in fractions derived from tissues of rat. In skin, lung or whole fetal tissues other than granuloma, GTP enhanced the enzymatic activity by 3-4 fold. On the other hand, in kidney, liver and spleen tissues it brought about no enhancement. The same results were obtained even if ATP regenerating system was added in the assay medium. The stimulatory effect of nucleoside triphosphates was not seen with the soluble fraction of liver, but it appeared with the enzyme fraction purified by affinity column chromatography. The same phenomenon was observed by addition of bovine serum albumin instead of nucleoside triphosphates as stimulator. We discuss the possible reasons as to why the responses of the enzyme to stimulators were quite different among various tissues.

摘要

大鼠肉芽组织可溶性部分(105000×g 上清液)中的脯氨酰羟化酶(脯氨酸、2-氧代戊二酸双加氧酶,EC 1.14.11.2)在测定介质中添加核苷三磷酸后活性显著增强。但核苷三磷酸的刺激活性在源自大鼠不同组织的部分中差异很大。在皮肤、肺或除肉芽肿外的整个胎儿组织中,GTP 可使酶活性增强 3 至 4 倍。另一方面,在肾脏、肝脏和脾脏组织中,它并未带来活性增强。即使在测定介质中添加了 ATP 再生系统,也得到了相同的结果。核苷三磷酸对肝脏可溶性部分没有刺激作用,但对通过亲和柱色谱法纯化的酶部分有刺激作用。用牛血清白蛋白代替核苷三磷酸作为刺激剂时也观察到了相同的现象。我们讨论了该酶对刺激剂的反应在不同组织间差异很大的可能原因。

相似文献

1
Different responses to some stimulators of prolyl hydroxylase activities in various rat organs.不同大鼠器官对某些脯氨酰羟化酶活性刺激物的不同反应。
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Oct 13;484(2):301-6. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(77)90086-9.
2
Stimulation of protocollagen proline hydroxylase activity by nucleoside triphosphates.核苷三磷酸对原胶原脯氨酸羟化酶活性的刺激作用。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Apr 19;69(4):957-61. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)90466-6.
3
Peptidyl proline hydroxylase in adult, developing, and neoplastic rat tissues.
Cancer Res. 1975 Apr;35(4):1009-14.
4
Stimulation of prolyl hydroxylase activity by bleomycin.博来霉素对脯氨酰羟化酶活性的刺激作用。
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1978 Sep;31(9):884-7. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.31.884.
5
Collagen prolyl hydroxylase levels in experimental paraquat poisoning.实验性百草枯中毒时的胶原蛋白脯氨酰羟化酶水平
Br J Exp Pathol. 1978 Jun;59(3):288-91.
6
Collagen proline hydroxylase in wound healing, granuloma formation, scurvy, and growth.胶原蛋白脯氨酸羟化酶在伤口愈合、肉芽肿形成、坏血病及生长过程中的作用
Science. 1967 Aug 25;157(3791):927-9. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3791.927.
7
Temporal response of prolyl hydroxylase in pre-existing granuloma to glucocorticoid administration.预先存在的肉芽肿中脯氨酰羟化酶对糖皮质激素给药的时间反应。
J Pharm Pharmacol. 1979 Nov;31(11):780-2. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1979.tb13658.x.
8
Prolyl hydroxylase and an immunologically related protein in mammalian tissues.脯氨酰羟化酶及哺乳动物组织中的一种免疫相关蛋白。
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1974 Jan;160(1):340-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9861(74)80042-1.
9
Prolyl 3-hydroxylase and 4-hydroxylase activities in certain rat and chick-embryo tissues and age-related changes in their activities in the rat.某些大鼠和鸡胚组织中的脯氨酰3-羟化酶和4-羟化酶活性以及大鼠中这些酶活性的年龄相关变化。
Biochem J. 1979 Jan 15;178(1):127-31. doi: 10.1042/bj1780127.
10
Effect of hepatic injury on prolyl 3-hydroxylase and 4-hydroxylase activities in rat liver and on immunoreactive prolyl 4-hydroxylase concentrations in the liver and serum.肝损伤对大鼠肝脏中脯氨酰3-羟化酶和4-羟化酶活性以及肝脏和血清中免疫反应性脯氨酰4-羟化酶浓度的影响。
Biochem J. 1978 Jan 15;170(1):129-35. doi: 10.1042/bj1700129.