• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的机制和预测因素。

Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1057-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014
PMID:19926044
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine the mechanism and predictors of procedural failure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the transradial approach (TR).

BACKGROUND

Transradial approach PCI reduces vascular complications compared with a transfemoral approach (TF). However, the mechanism and predictors of TR-PCI failure have not been well-characterized.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients undergoing TR-PCI by low-to-intermediate volume operators with traditional TF guide catheters. Baseline characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TR-PCI failure.

RESULTS

A total of 2,100 patients underwent TR-PCI and represented 38% of PCI volume. Mean age was 64 +/- 12 years, and 17% were female. Vascular complications occurred in 22 (1%), and TR-PCI failure was observed in 98 (4.7%) patients. The mechanism of TR-PCI failure included inability to advance guide catheter to ascending aorta in 50 (51%), inadequate guide catheter support in 35 (36%), and unsuccessful radial artery puncture in 13 (13%) patients. The PCI was successful in 94 (96%) patients with TR-PCI failure by switching to TF. On multivariate analysis, age >75 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.33 to 6.40, p = 0.0006), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR: 7.47; 95% CI: 3.45 to 16.19, p = 0.0002), and height (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of TR-PCI failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Transradial approach PCI can be performed by low-to-intermediate volume operators with standard equipment with a low failure rate. Age >75 years, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and short stature are independent predictors of TR-PCI failure. Appropriate patient selection and careful risk assessment are needed to maximize benefits offered by TR-PCI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨经桡动脉入路(TR)行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中程序失败的机制和预测因素。

背景

与经股动脉入路(TF)相比,TR 可降低血管并发症的发生风险。然而,TR-PCI 失败的机制和预测因素尚未得到很好的描述。

方法

本研究纳入了由低至中量手术量的操作者采用传统 TF 导引导管行经 TR-PCI 的患者。前瞻性收集了基线特征、手术细节和临床结局。采用单因素和多因素分析确定 TR-PCI 失败的独立预测因素。

结果

共 2100 例患者接受了 TR-PCI,占 PCI 总例数的 38%。患者平均年龄为 64±12 岁,17%为女性。22 例(1%)发生血管并发症,98 例(4.7%)患者发生 TR-PCI 失败。TR-PCI 失败的机制包括 50 例(51%)导引导管无法进入升主动脉、35 例(36%)导引导管支持不足和 13 例(13%)桡动脉穿刺失败。94 例(96%)TR-PCI 失败患者通过转为 TF 成功完成 PCI。多因素分析显示,年龄>75 岁(比值比 [OR]:3.86;95%置信区间 [CI]:2.33 至 6.40,p=0.0006)、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(OR:7.47;95%CI:3.45 至 16.19,p=0.0002)和身高(OR:0.97;95%CI:0.95 至 0.99,p=0.02)是 TR-PCI 失败的独立预测因素。

结论

低至中量手术量的操作者采用标准设备行经 TR-PCI 可获得较低的失败率。年龄>75 岁、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术和身材矮小是 TR-PCI 失败的独立预测因素。需要进行适当的患者选择和仔细的风险评估,以最大限度地发挥 TR-PCI 的益处。

相似文献

1
Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的机制和预测因素。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1057-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014.
2
Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉入路失败的风险评分、原因和临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
3
Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-term outcomes.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干病变的比较:手术操作及长期预后比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1035-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.003.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在原发性动脉与先前冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中的旁路移植术:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.018.
5
Transradial access: just do it!经桡动脉入路:尽管去做!
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1065-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.023.
6
Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术术者学习曲线的特征分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(4):336-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.960864. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
7
Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.04.107.
8
Operator and institutional experience reduces room-to-balloon times for transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention.术者经验及机构经验可缩短经桡动脉直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的球囊到位时间。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Feb;26(2):80-6.
9
Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club.复杂结构性、冠状动脉及外周介入治疗中经桡动脉与经股动脉辅助入路的比较。多中心辅助注册研究结果:意大利桡动脉俱乐部的一项研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):97-102. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27087. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Does prior percutaneous coronary intervention adversely affect early and mid-term survival after coronary artery surgery?既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是否会对冠状动脉搭桥术后的早期和中期生存产生不利影响?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):758-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.04.018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Interscapular Lift: Unfolding the Tortuous Subclavian Artery.肩胛间上提术:显露迂曲的锁骨下动脉。
JACC Case Rep. 2025 Apr 16;30(8):103225. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.103225. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.桡动脉远端优先:澳大利亚冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性与安全性
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Radial to Femoral Access-Site Crossover.
桡动脉至股动脉穿刺部位交叉的患者特征与结局
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Jan 21;4(1):102450. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102450. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Impact of Anthropometric Measures on Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.人体测量指标对经皮冠状动脉介入手术中桡动脉远心端与传统入路的影响。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 13;4(2):101565. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101565. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Radial Artery Spasm-A Review on Incidence, Prevention and Treatment.桡动脉痉挛——发病率、预防与治疗综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):1897. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171897.
6
Comparative Analysis of Right vs. Left Radial Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Impact on Silent Cerebral Ischemia.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中右侧桡动脉入路与左侧桡动脉入路的对比分析:对无症状性脑缺血的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 23;60(8):1193. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081193.
7
Characteristics and outcome in cardiogenic shock according to vascular access site for percutaneous coronary intervention.根据经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的血管入路,心原性休克的特征和结局。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 Aug 28;13(8):615-623. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae078.
8
Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.血管动脉通路与闭合的最佳实践:心脏导管实验室当代指南
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 14;11:1349480. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349480. eCollection 2024.
9
Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Successful Coronary Angiography Through Right Radial Artery Access.经右桡动脉途径成功进行冠状动脉造影的临床和影像学预测因素
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jun 13;18:e21. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.04. eCollection 2023.
10
Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Catheterization through Distal Transradial Access: A Single-Center Data.经远端桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术的疗效和安全性分析:单中心数据。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2023 May 16;2023:2560659. doi: 10.1155/2023/2560659. eCollection 2023.