Institute of Agri-Food and Land Use (IAFLU), Queen's University, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5AG, United Kingdom.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009 Dec 15;877(32):4079-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.10.023. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
An enzyme labeled immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor assay for the detection of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins were developed and a comparative evaluation was performed. A polyclonal antibody (BC67) used in both assay formats was raised to saxitoxin-jeffamine-BSA in New Zealand white rabbits. Each assay format was designed as an inhibition assay. Shellfish samples (n=54) were evaluated by each method using two simple rapid extraction procedures and compared to the AOAC high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the mouse bioassay (MBA). The results of each assay format were comparable with the HPLC and MBA methods and demonstrate that an antibody with high sensitivity and broad specificity to PSP toxins can be applied to different immunological techniques. The method of choice will depend on the end-users needs. The reduced manual labor and simplicity of operation of the SPR biosensor compared to ELISA, ease of sample extraction and superior real time semi-quantitative analysis are key features that could make this technology applicable in a high-throughput monitoring unit.
建立了酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和表面等离子体共振(SPR)生物传感器测定法来检测麻痹性贝类毒素(PSP)毒素,并进行了比较评估。两种检测方法均使用针对 saxitoxin-jeffamine-BSA 的多克隆抗体(BC67),该抗体是在新西兰白兔中产生的。每个检测方法均设计为抑制检测。使用两种简单的快速提取程序,对贝类样本(n=54)进行了每种方法的评估,并与 AOAC 高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和小鼠生物测定法(MBA)进行了比较。每个检测方法的结果与 HPLC 和 MBA 方法相当,表明对 PSP 毒素具有高灵敏度和广泛特异性的抗体可应用于不同的免疫学技术。选择哪种方法将取决于最终用户的需求。与 ELISA 相比,SPR 生物传感器具有减少的人工操作和简单的操作,易于进行样品提取,并且具有优越的实时半定量分析,这些都是使该技术能够在高通量监测单元中应用的关键特征。