Suppr超能文献

比较认知行为疗法、问题解决疗法和常规治疗在高危人群中的效果。

Comparing cognitive behavior therapy, problem solving therapy, and treatment as usual in a high risk population.

机构信息

University of Southern Queensland, Mental Health Service, Acute Care Team, Adult Mental Health, 100 Sixth Avenue, Maroochydore, QLD 4558, Australia.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2009 Oct;39(5):538-47. doi: 10.1521/suli.2009.39.5.538.

Abstract

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), problem-solving therapy (PST), or treatment as usual (TAU) were compared in the management of suicide attempters. Participants completed the Beck Hopelessness Scale, Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, Social Problem-Solving Inventory, and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire at pre- and posttreatment. Both CBT and PST indicated significant improvements over time within the majority of measured variables; when compared to TAU, both groups showed significant differences on satisfaction. When PST was compared to TAU, results indicated significant differences on suicidal ideation, indicating overall efficacy of brief therapies with suicide attempters.

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)、问题解决疗法(PST)或常规治疗(TAU)在自杀未遂者的管理中进行了比较。参与者在治疗前后完成了贝克绝望量表、贝克自杀意念量表、社会问题解决量表和客户满意度问卷。CBT 和 PST 在大多数测量变量上都显示出随着时间的推移有显著改善;与 TAU 相比,两组在满意度上均显示出显著差异。当 PST 与 TAU 进行比较时,结果表明在自杀意念上有显著差异,表明简短治疗对自杀未遂者的总体疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验