Balci Canan, Karabekir H S, Kahraman F, Sivaci R G
Department of Anaesthesiology, Afyon Kocatepe University School of Medicine, Ali Cetinkaya Kampusu, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
J Int Med Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):1336-42. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700508.
Comparison of entropy (state entropy [SE] and response entropy [RE]) with the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol sedation in monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) was carried out in patients undergoing hand surgery. Thirty candidates for elective hand surgery were pre-medicated with midazolam 0.06 mg/kg and atropine 0.01 mg/kg. Sedation was induced with intravenous propofol and fentanyl was also administered. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) was used to determine sedation level and pain was maintained at < 4 on a 0 - 10 verbal rating scale. The BIS, entropy, MOAA/S and pain values were recorded before initiation of sedation (control), during initiation of sedation, during surgery, and for 30 min after the end of surgery and anaesthesia. On initiation of sedation, entropy decreased more rapidly than BIS. At 10 min after initiation of sedation, the mean +/- SD values for MOAA/S, BIS, RE and SE were 3.00 +/- 0.36, 85.45 +/- 0.15, 74.00 +/- 0.60 and 72.02 +/- 0.12, respectively. During recovery, BIS and RE and SE increased in parallel with MOAA/S. It is concluded that entropy monitoring is as reliable as BIS monitoring in MAC.
在手外科手术患者的监测麻醉护理(MAC)中,对丙泊酚镇静期间的熵(状态熵[SE]和反应熵[RE])与脑电双频指数(BIS)进行了比较。30名择期手外科手术患者术前接受了0.06mg/kg咪达唑仑和0.01mg/kg阿托品预处理。静脉注射丙泊酚诱导镇静,并给予芬太尼。采用改良的警觉/镇静状态观察者评估量表(MOAA/S)确定镇静水平,疼痛维持在0-10言语评分量表的<4分。记录镇静开始前(对照)、镇静开始期间、手术期间以及手术和麻醉结束后30分钟的BIS、熵、MOAA/S和疼痛值。在镇静开始时,熵比BIS下降得更快。镇静开始后10分钟,MOAA/S、BIS、RE和SE的平均±标准差分别为3.00±0.36、85.45±0.15、74.00±0.60和72.02±0.12。在恢复过程中,BIS、RE和SE与MOAA/S平行升高。得出的结论是,在MAC中,熵监测与BIS监测一样可靠。