Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Dec;85(12):795-8. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.11.001.
Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability is promising for assessing fetal condition. Before using spectral analysis for fetal monitoring it has to be determined whether there should be a correction for gestational age or behavioural state.
Compare spectral values of heart rate variability between near term and post term fetuses during active and quiet sleep.
Case-control. Cases had a gestational age of > or =42 weeks; controls were 36 to 37 weeks. Fetuses were matched for birth weight percentile.
STAN registrations from healthy fetuses. For each fetus one 5-minute segment was selected during active and one during quiet sleep.
Absolute and normalized low (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high frequency power (0.4-1.5 Hz) of heart rate variability.
Twenty fetuses were included. No significant differences were found between cases and controls in absolute (481 and 429 respectively, P=0.88) or normalized low (0.78 and 0.80 respectively, P=0.50) or absolute (41 and 21 respectively, P=0.23) or normalized high frequency power (0.08 and 0.07 respectively, P=0.20) during active state. During rest, normalized low frequency power was lower (0.58 and 0.69 respectively, P=0.03) and absolute (16 and 10 respectively, P=0.04) and normalized high frequency power were higher (0.21 and 0.14 respectively, P=0.01) in cases compared to controls. Absolute and normalized low frequency power were higher during active state compared to rest in both groups (all P values <0.05).
We found sympathetic predominance during active state in fetuses around term. Post term parasympathetic modulation during rest was increased compared to near term.
胎儿心率变异性的频谱分析在评估胎儿状况方面具有很大的潜力。在将频谱分析应用于胎儿监测之前,必须确定是否应该对胎龄或行为状态进行校正。
比较活跃睡眠和安静睡眠时近足月和足月后胎儿心率变异性的频谱值。
病例对照研究。病例组胎龄≥42 周;对照组为 36 至 37 周。胎儿按出生体重百分位进行匹配。
来自健康胎儿的 STAN 记录。为每个胎儿选择 1 个 5 分钟的活跃期和 1 个安静期片段。
心率变异性的绝对低频(0.04-0.15 Hz)和高频功率(0.4-1.5 Hz)和归一化低频(0.78-0.80)和高频功率(0.08-0.07)。
共纳入 20 例胎儿。病例组和对照组在活跃期的绝对低频(481 和 429,P=0.88)或归一化低频(0.78 和 0.80,P=0.50)或绝对高频(41 和 21,P=0.23)或归一化高频功率(0.08 和 0.07,P=0.20)均无显著差异。在休息时,病例组的归一化低频功率较低(0.58 和 0.69,P=0.03),绝对低频(16 和 10,P=0.04)和归一化高频功率较高(0.21 和 0.14,P=0.01)。与对照组相比,两组在活跃期的绝对低频和归一化低频功率均高于休息期(P 值均<0.05)。
我们发现,接近足月的胎儿在活跃期时交感神经占优势。与近足月相比,足月后休息时副交感神经调节增加。