Division of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Pavia, IRCCS S.Matteo Hospital Foundation, WHO Collaborating Center for Clinical Management of Cystic Echinococcosis, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Acta Trop. 2010 Apr;114(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
The earlier recommendations of the WHO-Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE) for the treatment of human echinococcosis have had considerable impact in different settings worldwide, but the last major revision was published more than 10 years ago. Advances in classification and treatment of echinococcosis prompted experts from different continents to review the current literature, discuss recent achievements and provide a consensus on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Among the recognized species, two are of medical importance -Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis - causing cystic echinococcosis (CE) and alveolar echinococcosis (AE), respectively. For CE, consensus has been obtained on an image-based, stage-specific approach, which is helpful for choosing one of the following options: (1) percutaneous treatment, (2) surgery, (3) anti-infective drug treatment or (4) watch and wait. Clinical decision-making depends also on setting-specific aspects. The usage of an imaging-based classification system is highly recommended. For AE, early diagnosis and radical (tumour-like) surgery followed by anti-infective prophylaxis with albendazole remains one of the key elements. However, most patients with AE are diagnosed at a later stage, when radical surgery (distance of larval to liver tissue of >2cm) cannot be achieved. The backbone of AE treatment remains the continuous medical treatment with albendazole, and if necessary, individualized interventional measures. With this approach, the prognosis can be improved for the majority of patients with AE. The consensus of experts under the aegis of the WHO-IWGE will help promote studies that provide missing evidence to be included in the next update.
世界卫生组织包虫病非正式工作组(WHO-IWGE)之前针对人类包虫病治疗的建议在全球不同环境中产生了相当大的影响,但最后一次重大修订是在 10 多年前发布的。包虫病分类和治疗的进步促使来自不同大洲的专家对当前文献进行了审查,讨论了最新进展,并就诊断、治疗和随访达成了共识。在公认的物种中,有两种具有医学重要性——细粒棘球蚴和多房棘球蚴——分别引起囊型包虫病(CE)和泡型包虫病(AE)。对于 CE,已经就基于图像的、特定阶段的方法达成了共识,这有助于选择以下选项之一:(1)经皮治疗,(2)手术,(3)抗感染药物治疗或(4)观察和等待。临床决策还取决于特定环境的因素。强烈建议使用基于影像学的分类系统。对于 AE,早期诊断和根治性(肿瘤样)手术,随后使用阿苯达唑进行抗感染预防,仍然是关键要素之一。然而,大多数 AE 患者在晚期被诊断出来,此时无法进行根治性手术(幼虫与肝组织的距离>2cm)。AE 治疗的骨干仍然是阿苯达唑的持续医学治疗,如果需要,还可以进行个体化的介入措施。通过这种方法,可以改善大多数 AE 患者的预后。在世界卫生组织包虫病非正式工作组的支持下,专家的共识将有助于推动研究,为下一次更新提供缺失的证据。