• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物燃料的间接排放:有多重要?

Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important?

机构信息

The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL), 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2009 Dec 4;326(5958):1397-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1180251. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1126/science.1180251
PMID:19933101
Abstract

A global biofuels program will lead to intense pressures on land supply and can increase greenhouse gas emissions from land-use changes. Using linked economic and terrestrial biogeochemistry models, we examined direct and indirect effects of possible land-use changes from an expanded global cellulosic bioenergy program on greenhouse gas emissions over the 21st century. Our model predicts that indirect land use will be responsible for substantially more carbon loss (up to twice as much) than direct land use; however, because of predicted increases in fertilizer use, nitrous oxide emissions will be more important than carbon losses themselves in terms of warming potential. A global greenhouse gas emissions policy that protects forests and encourages best practices for nitrogen fertilizer use can dramatically reduce emissions associated with biofuels production.

摘要

一个全球性的生物燃料计划将导致对土地供应的巨大压力,并可能增加土地利用变化产生的温室气体排放。我们使用关联的经济和陆地生物地球化学模型,研究了扩大全球纤维素生物能源计划可能导致的土地利用变化的直接和间接影响,以及这些变化对 21 世纪温室气体排放的影响。我们的模型预测,间接土地利用将导致比直接土地利用更多的碳损失(高达两倍);然而,由于预计化肥使用量增加,一氧化二氮排放将比碳损失本身对变暖潜力更为重要。一个保护森林和鼓励最佳氮肥使用实践的全球温室气体排放政策,可以显著减少与生物燃料生产相关的排放。

相似文献

1
Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important?生物燃料的间接排放:有多重要?
Science. 2009 Dec 4;326(5958):1397-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1180251. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
2
Effects of fuel and forest conservation on future levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.燃料与森林保护对未来大气二氧化碳水平的影响。
Glob Planet Change. 1992;97:151-89.
3
Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink.臭氧对陆地碳汇的影响所导致的气候变化的间接辐射强迫。
Nature. 2007 Aug 16;448(7155):791-4. doi: 10.1038/nature06059. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
4
Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.农业领域的气候变化减缓:水质效益与成本
Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(11):2093-9. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.906.
5
Sustainable agricultural practices: energy inputs and outputs, pesticide, fertilizer and greenhouse gas management.可持续农业实践:能源投入与产出、农药、肥料及温室气体管理。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2009;18(4):498-500.
6
Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels.森林生物能源还是森林碳汇?用木质燃料评估温室气体减排中的权衡。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 15;45(2):789-95. doi: 10.1021/es1024004. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
7
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications.减少森林砍伐和森林退化所致温室气体排放:对全球土地利用的影响
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1454-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1155358.
8
Biodiesel production in a semiarid environment: a life cycle assessment approach.在半干旱环境中生产生物柴油:生命周期评估方法。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 1;45(7):3069-74. doi: 10.1021/es1031807. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
9
Biofuels that cause land-use change may have much larger non-GHG air quality emissions than fossil fuels.生物燃料引起土地利用变化可能会产生比化石燃料大得多的非温室气体空气质量排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 2;46(19):10835-41. doi: 10.1021/es301851x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
10
Using land to mitigate climate change: hitting the target, recognizing the trade-offs.利用土地缓解气候变化:实现目标,认识到权衡取舍。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jun 5;46(11):5672-9. doi: 10.1021/es2034729. Epub 2012 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the Scale of Global Human Needs and Opportunities for Sustainable Catalytic Technologies.全球人类需求规模及可持续催化技术机遇分析
Top Catal. 2023;66(5-8):338-374. doi: 10.1007/s11244-023-01799-3. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
Direct and indirect impacts of synthetic biology on biodiversity conservation.合成生物学对生物多样性保护的直接和间接影响。
iScience. 2022 Oct 20;25(11):105423. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105423. eCollection 2022 Nov 18.
3
N and P constrain C in ecosystems under climate change: Role of nutrient redistribution, accumulation, and stoichiometry.
在气候变化下的生态系统中,氮和磷会限制碳的作用:养分再分配、积累和化学计量的作用。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Dec;32(8):e2684. doi: 10.1002/eap.2684. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Choices in land representation materially affect modeled biofuel carbon intensity estimates.土地表征方式的选择对模拟的生物燃料碳强度估计有重大影响。
J Clean Prod. 2022 May;349:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131477.
5
Light-driven carbon dioxide reduction to methane by Methanosarcina barkeri in an electric syntrophic coculture.产甲烷八叠球菌在电异养共培养物中光驱动二氧化碳还原为甲烷。
ISME J. 2022 Feb;16(2):370-377. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01078-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
6
Agriculture and forest land use change in the continental United States: Are there tipping points?美国大陆的农业和林地利用变化:是否存在临界点?
iScience. 2021 Jun 24;24(7):102772. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102772. eCollection 2021 Jul 23.
7
The long arm of climate change: societal teleconnections and the future of climate change impacts studies.气候变化的长远影响:社会遥相关与气候变化影响研究的未来
Clim Change. 2015;129(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1328-z. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
Opinion: Reconsidering bioenergy given the urgency of climate protection.观点:鉴于气候保护的紧迫性,重新审视生物能源
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):9642-9645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814120115.
9
Toward a consistent modeling framework to assess multi-sectoral climate impacts.迈向一致的建模框架,以评估多部门气候影响。
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 13;9(1):660. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02984-9.
10
Prospective technologies, feedstocks and market innovations for ethanol and biodiesel production in the US.美国乙醇和生物柴油生产的前瞻性技术、原料及市场创新
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2014 Sep 4;4:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.09.001. eCollection 2014 Dec.