Suppr超能文献

在使用恒流、恒速和空气幕隔离通风柜时的空气传播纳米颗粒暴露。

Airborne nanoparticle exposures while using constant-flow, constant-velocity, and air-curtain-isolated fume hoods.

作者信息

Tsai Su-Jung Candace, Huang Rong Fung, Ellenbecker Michael J

机构信息

Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Jan;54(1):78-87. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep074. Epub 2009 Nov 20.

Abstract

Tsai et al. (Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods. J Nanopart Res 2009; 11: 147-61) found that the handling of dry nanoalumina and nanosilver inside laboratory fume hoods can cause a significant release of airborne nanoparticles from the hood. Hood design affects the magnitude of release. With traditionally designed fume hoods, the airflow moves horizontally toward the hood cupboard; the turbulent airflow formed in the worker wake region interacts with the vortex in the constant-flow fume hood and this can cause nanoparticles to be carried out with the circulating airflow. Airborne particle concentrations were measured for three hood designs (constant-flow, constant-velocity, and air-curtain hoods) using manual handling of nanoalumina particles. The hood operator's airborne nanoparticle breathing zone exposure was measured over the size range from 5 nm to 20 mum. Experiments showed that the exposure magnitude for a constant-flow hood had high variability. The results for the constant-velocity hood varied by operating conditions, but were usually very low. The performance of the air-curtain hood, a new design with significantly different airflow pattern from traditional hoods, was consistent under all operating conditions and release was barely detected. Fog tests showed more intense turbulent airflow in traditional hoods and that the downward airflow from the double-layered sash to the suction slot of the air-curtain hood did not cause turbulence seen in other hoods.

摘要

蔡等人(《通风橱内人工处理纳米氧化铝和纳米银过程中与空气中纳米颗粒暴露的关联》。《纳米颗粒研究杂志》2009年;11卷:147 - 161页)发现,在实验室通风橱内处理干燥的纳米氧化铝和纳米银会导致通风橱中有大量空气中的纳米颗粒释放。通风橱设计会影响释放量。对于传统设计的通风橱,气流水平流向通风橱橱柜;在工人尾流区域形成的紊流气流与恒流通风橱中的涡流相互作用,这会导致纳米颗粒随着循环气流被带出。使用人工处理纳米氧化铝颗粒的方式,对三种通风橱设计(恒流、恒速和空气幕通风橱)的空气中颗粒浓度进行了测量。在5纳米至20微米的尺寸范围内,对通风橱操作人员呼吸区域的空气中纳米颗粒暴露情况进行了测量。实验表明,恒流通风橱的暴露量变化很大。恒速通风橱的结果因操作条件而异,但通常非常低。空气幕通风橱是一种气流模式与传统通风橱有显著不同的新设计,在所有操作条件下其性能都很稳定,几乎检测不到释放。烟雾测试表明传统通风橱中的紊流气流更强,并且空气幕通风橱从双层窗扇到吸入口的向下气流不会引起其他通风橱中出现的紊流。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验