Heitbrink William A, Lo Li-Ming, Dunn Kevin H
a LMK OSH Consulting LLC , Cincinnati , Ohio.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(1):16-28. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2014.930559.
Because nanomaterials are thought to be more biologically active than their larger parent compounds, careful control of exposures to nanomaterials is recommended. Field studies were conducted at three sites to develop information about the effectiveness of control measures including process changes, a downflow room, a ventilated enclosure, and an enclosed reactor. Aerosol mass and number concentrations were measured during specific operations with a photometer and an electrical mobility particle sizer to provide concentration measurements across a broad range of sizes (from 5.6 nm to 30 μm). At site A, the dust exposure and during product harvesting was eliminated by implementing a wait time of 30 -min following process completion. And, the dust exposure attributed to process tank cleaning was reduced from 0.7 to 0.2 mg/m3 by operating the available process ventilation during this task. At site B, a ventilated enclosure was used to control dust generated by the manual weigh-out and manipulation of powdered nanomaterials inside of a downflow room. Dust exposures were at room background (under 0.04 mg/m3 and 500 particles/cm3) during these tasks however, manipulations conducted outside of the enclosure were correlated with a transient increase in concentration measured at the source. At site C, a digitally controlled reactor was used to produce aligned carbon nanotubes. This reactor was a closed system and the ventilation functioned as a redundant control measure. Process emissions were well controlled by this system with the exception of increased concentrations measured during the unloading of the product. However, this emission source could be easily controlled through increasing cabinet ventilation. The identification and adoption of effective control technologies is an important first step in reducing the risk associated with worker exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Properly designing and evaluating the effectiveness of these controls is a key component in a comprehensive health and safety program.
由于纳米材料被认为比其更大的母体化合物具有更高的生物活性,因此建议谨慎控制纳米材料的暴露。在三个地点进行了现场研究,以获取有关控制措施有效性的信息,这些措施包括工艺变更、下行流室、通风罩和封闭式反应器。在特定操作期间,使用光度计和电迁移率粒径分析仪测量气溶胶质量和数量浓度,以提供广泛尺寸范围(从5.6纳米到30微米)的浓度测量值。在A地点,通过在工艺完成后设置30分钟的等待时间,消除了产品收获期间的粉尘暴露。此外,通过在这项任务期间运行可用的工艺通风,将工艺罐清洁导致的粉尘暴露从0.7毫克/立方米降至0.2毫克/立方米。在B地点,使用通风罩来控制下行流室内手动称量和处理粉末状纳米材料产生的粉尘。在这些任务期间,粉尘暴露处于室内背景水平(低于0.04毫克/立方米和500颗粒/立方厘米),然而,在通风罩外进行的操作与源头测量的浓度短暂增加相关。在C地点,使用数控反应器生产定向碳纳米管。该反应器是一个封闭系统,通风用作冗余控制措施。除了在产品卸载期间测量到浓度增加外,该系统对工艺排放的控制效果良好。然而,通过增加柜体通风可以轻松控制这个排放源。识别和采用有效的控制技术是降低与工人接触工程纳米颗粒相关风险的重要第一步。正确设计和评估这些控制措施的有效性是全面健康与安全计划的关键组成部分。