• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Recency in verb phrase attachment.

作者信息

Pearlmutter N J, Gibson E

机构信息

Psychology Department, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):574-90. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.574.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.574
PMID:11294450
Abstract

Four experiments investigated attachment preferences in constructions involving 3 verb phrases (VPs) followed by an attaching modifier. Readers preferred attachment to the most recent (lowest) VP site overall and preferred to attach the modifier to the middle VP over the highest VP, demonstrating a monotonic recency-based preference ordering. This pattern could not be attributed to lexical or plausibility-based preferences. The results contrast with the pattern for relative clause attachment into 3 potential noun phrase sites, where the preference ordering is nonmonotonic (e.g., E. Gibson, N. J. Pearlmutter, E. Canseco-Gonzalez, & G. Hickok, 1996), and support the multiple-constraint theory described by E. Gibson and N. J. Pearlmutter (1998), which proposes that recency/locality and a secondary factor, predicate proximity, combine with lexical, grammatical, prosodic, and contextual constraints to determine attachment preferences.

摘要

相似文献

1
Recency in verb phrase attachment.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):574-90. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.574.
2
Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish.西班牙语中的近期性和词汇偏好。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul;27(4):603-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03211554.
3
Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.句子处理中特定动词的限制:区分词汇偏好与花园路径效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 May;19(3):528-53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.528.
4
Argument status and PP-attachment.论点状态与PP附着
J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 Sep;35(5):385-403. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9021-z.
5
The role of pragmatic principles in resolving attachment ambiguities: evidence from eye movements.语用原则在解决依恋模糊性中的作用:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):314-28. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.314.
6
Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.句子理解过程中动词信息使用的局限性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):132-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196149.
7
Processing and Comprehension of Locally Ambiguous Participial Relative Clause Sentences in Russian.俄语中局部歧义分词性关系从句句子的加工与理解。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Feb 21;53(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10041-4.
8
Cross-structural priming: prepositional phrase attachment primes relative clause attachment.跨结构启动:介词短语附着启动关系从句附着。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(3):227-34. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000089.
9
The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.语义匹配对在线句子处理的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Nov;26(6):1304-12. doi: 10.3758/bf03201202.
10
The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.毕竟,解析器不会忽略不及物性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):550-69. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.550.

引用本文的文献

1
Processing and Comprehension of Locally Ambiguous Participial Relative Clause Sentences in Russian.俄语中局部歧义分词性关系从句句子的加工与理解。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Feb 21;53(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10041-4.
2
What Limits Our Capacity to Process Nested Long-Range Dependencies in Sentence Comprehension?是什么限制了我们在句子理解中处理嵌套长距离依存关系的能力?
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Apr 16;22(4):446. doi: 10.3390/e22040446.
3
Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing.句子理解过程中的直接访问检索:来自省略结构的证据。
J Mem Lang. 2011 May;64(4):327-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.006.
4
Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production.主谓一致生成中的层次结构和范围。
Cognition. 2011 Mar;118(3):377-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 27.
5
When language comprehension reflects production constraints: resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience.当语言理解反映了生产限制:借助过去的经验解决歧义。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1177-86. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1177.
6
The role of pragmatic principles in resolving attachment ambiguities: evidence from eye movements.语用原则在解决依恋模糊性中的作用:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):314-28. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.314.
7
Against repair-based reanalysis in sentence comprehension.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2003 Mar;32(2):141-66. doi: 10.1023/a:1022496223965.