Hirata Akimasa, Yamazaki Kenichi, Hamada Shoji, Kamimura Yoshitsugu, Tarao Hiroo, Wake Kanako, Suzuki Yukihisa, Hayashi Noriyuki, Fujiwara Osamu
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya, Japan.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Mar;138(3):237-44. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncp251. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
The present study provides an intercomparison of the induced quantities in a human model for uniform magnetic field exposures at extremely low frequency. A total of six research groups have cooperated in this joint intercomparison study. The computational conditions and numeric human phantom including the conductivity of tissue were set identically to focus on the uncertainty in computed fields. Differences in the maximal and 99th percentile value of the in situ electric field were less than 30 and 10 % except for the results of one group. Differences in the current density averaged over 1 cm(2) of the central nerve tissue are 10 % or less except for the results of one group. This comparison suggests that the computational uncertainty of the in situ electric field/current density due to different methods and coding is smaller than that caused by different human phantoms and the conductivitys of tissue, which was reported in a previous study.
本研究对极低频均匀磁场暴露人体模型中的感应量进行了相互比较。共有六个研究小组参与了这项联合相互比较研究。计算条件和包括组织电导率在内的数字人体模型均设置相同,以关注计算场中的不确定性。除一组结果外,原位电场最大值和第99百分位数的差异小于30%和10%。除一组结果外,中枢神经组织1平方厘米上平均电流密度的差异为10%或更小。该比较表明,与先前研究报告的不同人体模型和组织电导率所导致的情况相比,不同方法和编码引起的原位电场/电流密度计算不确定性更小。