• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram.利用综合列线图评估局限性肾细胞癌患者的总生存和死亡竞争风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):311-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4816. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
2
Competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a comorbidity based model.局限性肾细胞癌患者死亡的竞争风险:基于合并症的模型。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2077-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.100. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
3
Population-based external validation of a competing-risks nomogram for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.基于人群的局限性肾细胞癌患者竞争风险列线图的外部验证
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):e299-300; author reply e301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6345. Epub 2010 May 17.
4
Population-based study evaluating and predicting the probability of death resulting from thyroid cancer and other causes among patients with thyroid cancer.基于人群的研究评估和预测甲状腺癌患者因甲状腺癌和其他原因导致死亡的概率。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 1;31(4):468-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.4457. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
5
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.开发和验证用于预测转移性肾细胞癌患者总生存期的列线图。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1066. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07586-7.
6
Age, tumor size and relative survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis.局限性肾细胞癌患者的年龄、肿瘤大小及相对生存率:一项监测、流行病学与最终结果分析
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.026. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
7
Nomogram model for predicting cause-specific mortality in patients with stage I small-cell lung cancer: a competing risk analysis.列线图模型预测 I 期小细胞肺癌患者的特定原因死亡率:竞争风险分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):793. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07271-9.
8
The first competing risk survival nomogram in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.首个用于预测乳头状肾细胞癌患者的竞争风险生存诺莫图。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 4;11(1):11835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91217-z.
9
Validation of a Postoperative Nomogram Predicting Recurrence in Patients with Conventional Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.验证一种用于预测常规透明细胞肾细胞癌患者复发的术后列线图。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
The Karakiewicz nomogram is the most useful clinical predictor for survival outcomes in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.卡拉克维茨列线图是预测局限性肾细胞癌患者生存结局最有用的临床预测因子。
Cancer. 2011 Dec 1;117(23):5314-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26193. Epub 2011 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing mortality risk and causes in extramammary Paget's disease: insights from a population-based study.评估乳腺外佩吉特病的死亡风险及病因:一项基于人群研究的见解
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):62-70. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1434. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Risk factors of surgical compliance and impact on survival in patients with kidney cancer: a population-based, propensity score matching study.手术依从性的风险因素及其对肾癌患者生存的影响:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 14;409(1):348. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03542-2.
3
Crafting and Authenticating Prognostic Nomograms for Overall and Cancer-specific Survival in Pediatric Small Renal Masses: A Comprehensive Two-Decade Cohort Study.制作并验证儿科小肾肿块患者总生存和肿瘤特异生存的预后列线图:一项长达二十年的综合队列研究。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241284845. doi: 10.1177/15330338241284845.
4
2022 WUOF/SIU International Consultation on Urological Diseases: Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses.2022年世界泌尿外科肿瘤联合会/国际泌尿外科学会国际泌尿外科疾病咨询会议:小肾肿瘤的主动监测
Soc Int Urol J. 2022 Nov;3(6):424-436. doi: 10.48083/oses5540.
5
Prognostic factors of renal cell cancer in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study.老年患者肾细胞癌的预后因素:基于人群的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56835-3.
6
How to use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data: research design and methodology.如何使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据:研究设计和方法。
Mil Med Res. 2023 Oct 31;10(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00488-2.
7
Minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatments for T1 renal cell cancer in patients over 75 years: a comparison of outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation.75 岁以上患者 T1 期肾细胞癌的微创保肾治疗:机器人辅助部分肾切除术与经皮消融术治疗效果比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8426-8435. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09975-5. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
Trends in cause of death among patients with renal cell carcinoma in the United States: a SEER-based study.美国肾细胞癌患者死因趋势:一项基于 SEER 的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15647-2.
9
Critical Appraisal of Leibovich 2018 and GRANT Models for Prediction of Cancer-Specific Survival in Non-Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.对Leibovich 2018模型和GRANT模型预测非转移性嫌色细胞肾细胞癌特异性癌症生存率的批判性评估
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;15(7):2155. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072155.
10
RP11-367G18.1 V2 enhances clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression via induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.RP11-367G18.1 V2 通过诱导上皮-间充质转化促进透明细胞肾细胞癌的进展。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9788-9801. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5723. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity analysis to investigate the impact of a missing covariate on survival analyses using cancer registry data.敏感性分析,以研究使用癌症登记数据时缺失协变量对生存分析的影响。
Stat Med. 2009 May 1;28(10):1498-511. doi: 10.1002/sim.3557.
2
Histopathological characteristics of localized renal cell carcinoma correlate with tumor size: a SEER analysis.局限性肾细胞癌的组织病理学特征与肿瘤大小相关:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):29-33; discussion 33-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass : a meta-analysis.小肾肿块的冷冻消融或射频消融:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;113(10):2671-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23896.
4
Preoperative nomogram predicting 12-year probability of metastatic renal cancer.预测转移性肾癌12年概率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2146-51; discussion 2151. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.101. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Cancer statistics, 2008.2008年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
6
Delayed intervention of sporadic renal masses undergoing active surveillance.对接受主动监测的散发性肾肿块的延迟干预。
Cancer. 2008 Mar 1;112(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23268.
7
Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma--a meta-analysis and review.切除、消融还是观察:小肾肿物的困境——一项荟萃分析与综述
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1227-33; discussion 1233-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.047. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
8
Survival analysis of clear cell renal carcinoma according to the Charlson comorbidity index.根据查尔森合并症指数对透明细胞肾细胞癌进行生存分析。
J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):857-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.048. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
9
A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer.一种预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术或放疗候选者10年预期寿命的列线图。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3576-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3820.
10
A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy.适用于行部分肾切除术的直径7厘米及以下实性强化肾肿瘤的术前预后列线图。
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.106. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

利用综合列线图评估局限性肾细胞癌患者的总生存和死亡竞争风险。

Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram.

机构信息

Department of Urological Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):311-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4816. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4816
PMID:19933918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2815719/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Many patients with localized node-negative renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are elderly with competing comorbidities. Their overall survival benefit after surgical treatment is unknown. We reviewed cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate the impact of kidney cancer versus competing causes of death in patients with localized RCC and develop a comprehensive nomogram to quantitate survival differences.

METHODS

We identified individuals with localized, surgically treated clear-cell, papillary, or chromophobe RCC in SEER (1988 through 2003). We used Fine and Gray competing risks proportional hazards regressions to predict 5-year probabilities of three competing mortality outcomes: kidney cancer death, other cancer death, and noncancer death.

RESULTS

We identified 30,801 cases of localized RCC (median age, 62 years; median tumor size, 4.5 cm). Five-year probabilities of kidney cancer death, other cancer death, and noncancer death were 4%, 7%, and 11%, respectively. Age was strongly predictive of mortality and most predictive of nonkidney cancer deaths (P < .001). Increasing tumor size was related to death from RCC and inversely related to noncancer deaths (P < .001). Racial differences in outcomes were most pronounced for nonkidney cancer deaths (P < .001). Men were more likely to die than women from all causes (P < .002). This nomogram integrates commonly available factors into a useful tool for comparing competing risks of death.

CONCLUSION

Management of localized RCC must consider competing causes of mortality, particularly in elderly populations. Effective decision making requires treatment trade-off calculations. We present a tool to quantitate competing causes of mortality in patients with localized RCC.

摘要

目的

许多患有局限性淋巴结阴性肾细胞癌(RCC)的患者为老年患者,并存有多种合并症。其手术治疗后的总体生存获益尚不清楚。我们对监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的病例进行了回顾,以评估局限性 RCC 患者的肾癌与其他死亡原因的竞争对生存的影响,并开发了一种综合列线图来量化生存差异。

方法

我们在 SEER(1988 年至 2003 年)数据库中确定了接受手术治疗的局限性透明细胞癌、乳头状癌或嫌色细胞癌的患者。我们使用 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险比例风险回归来预测 5 年三种竞争死亡结局的概率:肾癌死亡、其他癌症死亡和非癌症死亡。

结果

我们确定了 30801 例局限性 RCC(中位年龄为 62 岁;中位肿瘤大小为 4.5cm)。肾癌死亡、其他癌症死亡和非癌症死亡的 5 年概率分别为 4%、7%和 11%。年龄是死亡率的重要预测因素,对非肾癌死亡的预测作用最大(P<0.001)。肿瘤大小的增加与 RCC 死亡相关,与非癌症死亡呈反比(P<0.001)。结局的种族差异在非肾癌死亡方面最为明显(P<0.001)。男性死于所有原因的可能性均高于女性(P<0.002)。该列线图将常见因素整合到一个用于比较死亡竞争风险的有用工具中。

结论

局限性 RCC 的治疗必须考虑到死亡率的其他原因,特别是在老年人群中。有效的决策需要对治疗进行权衡。我们提出了一种工具来量化局限性 RCC 患者的死亡竞争原因。