Suppr超能文献

利用综合列线图评估局限性肾细胞癌患者的总生存和死亡竞争风险。

Evaluating overall survival and competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma using a comprehensive nomogram.

机构信息

Department of Urological Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):311-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4816. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Many patients with localized node-negative renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are elderly with competing comorbidities. Their overall survival benefit after surgical treatment is unknown. We reviewed cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate the impact of kidney cancer versus competing causes of death in patients with localized RCC and develop a comprehensive nomogram to quantitate survival differences.

METHODS

We identified individuals with localized, surgically treated clear-cell, papillary, or chromophobe RCC in SEER (1988 through 2003). We used Fine and Gray competing risks proportional hazards regressions to predict 5-year probabilities of three competing mortality outcomes: kidney cancer death, other cancer death, and noncancer death.

RESULTS

We identified 30,801 cases of localized RCC (median age, 62 years; median tumor size, 4.5 cm). Five-year probabilities of kidney cancer death, other cancer death, and noncancer death were 4%, 7%, and 11%, respectively. Age was strongly predictive of mortality and most predictive of nonkidney cancer deaths (P < .001). Increasing tumor size was related to death from RCC and inversely related to noncancer deaths (P < .001). Racial differences in outcomes were most pronounced for nonkidney cancer deaths (P < .001). Men were more likely to die than women from all causes (P < .002). This nomogram integrates commonly available factors into a useful tool for comparing competing risks of death.

CONCLUSION

Management of localized RCC must consider competing causes of mortality, particularly in elderly populations. Effective decision making requires treatment trade-off calculations. We present a tool to quantitate competing causes of mortality in patients with localized RCC.

摘要

目的

许多患有局限性淋巴结阴性肾细胞癌(RCC)的患者为老年患者,并存有多种合并症。其手术治疗后的总体生存获益尚不清楚。我们对监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的病例进行了回顾,以评估局限性 RCC 患者的肾癌与其他死亡原因的竞争对生存的影响,并开发了一种综合列线图来量化生存差异。

方法

我们在 SEER(1988 年至 2003 年)数据库中确定了接受手术治疗的局限性透明细胞癌、乳头状癌或嫌色细胞癌的患者。我们使用 Fine 和 Gray 竞争风险比例风险回归来预测 5 年三种竞争死亡结局的概率:肾癌死亡、其他癌症死亡和非癌症死亡。

结果

我们确定了 30801 例局限性 RCC(中位年龄为 62 岁;中位肿瘤大小为 4.5cm)。肾癌死亡、其他癌症死亡和非癌症死亡的 5 年概率分别为 4%、7%和 11%。年龄是死亡率的重要预测因素,对非肾癌死亡的预测作用最大(P<0.001)。肿瘤大小的增加与 RCC 死亡相关,与非癌症死亡呈反比(P<0.001)。结局的种族差异在非肾癌死亡方面最为明显(P<0.001)。男性死于所有原因的可能性均高于女性(P<0.002)。该列线图将常见因素整合到一个用于比较死亡竞争风险的有用工具中。

结论

局限性 RCC 的治疗必须考虑到死亡率的其他原因,特别是在老年人群中。有效的决策需要对治疗进行权衡。我们提出了一种工具来量化局限性 RCC 患者的死亡竞争原因。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Preoperative nomogram predicting 12-year probability of metastatic renal cancer.预测转移性肾癌12年概率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2146-51; discussion 2151. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.101. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Cancer statistics, 2008.2008年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 Mar-Apr;58(2):71-96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验