Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine and Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):284-91; quiz 292-3. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181b4c8bd.
A primary goal of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) exercise is to increase cardiopulmonary fitness. The aim of this study was to identify characteristics of CR participants who fail to improve peak oxygen uptake (peakV(O(2))).
The study cohort included 385 consecutive patients with directly measured peakV(O(2)) prior to and upon completion of CR. Patients were classified as a "nonimprover" if exit peakV(O(2)) was less than or equal to entry peakV(O(2)).
Eighty-one (21%) patients failed to improve peakV(O(2)). Baseline characteristics predicting nonimprovement included the following: lower handgrip strength, lower peak exercise respiratory exchange ratio, a nonsurgical diagnosis, female status, and more medical comorbidities. The number of sessions attended and exercise duration were similar between groups. Nonimprovers, however, exercised at lower exercise intensity despite a similar rating of perceived exertion. By multivariate analysis, independent positive correlates of percentage change in peakV(O(2)) included exercise training intensity and baseline handgrip strength. Negative correlates included baseline peakV(O(2)), comorbidity score, self-reported physical function, and a diagnosis of diabetes (cumulative total r = 0.51, adjusted R = 0.26, P < .0001).
Twenty-one percent of CR participants failed to improve peakV(O(2)) primarily due to exercise training performed at lower relative intensity despite a similar rating of perceived exertion. For patients with baseline characteristics associated with nonimprovement, alternative training protocols should be considered.
心脏康复(CR)运动的主要目标之一是提高心肺适应性。本研究的目的是确定未能提高峰值摄氧量(peakV(O(2))的 CR 参与者的特征。
研究队列包括 385 例连续患者,在 CR 前后直接测量了峰值 V(O(2))。如果出峰 V(O(2))小于或等于入峰 V(O(2)),则将患者分类为“非改善者”。
81 名(21%)患者未能提高峰值 V(O(2))。预测非改善的基线特征包括:握力较低、峰值运动呼吸交换率较低、非手术诊断、女性状态和更多的合并症。两组之间的就诊次数和运动时间相似。然而,非改善者尽管感知用力相似,但运动强度较低。通过多变量分析,peakV(O(2))百分比变化的独立正相关因素包括运动训练强度和基线握力。负相关因素包括基线峰值 V(O(2))、合并症评分、自我报告的身体功能和糖尿病诊断(累积总 r = 0.51,调整 R = 0.26,P <.0001)。
21%的 CR 参与者未能提高 peakV(O(2)),主要是由于尽管感知用力相似,但运动训练强度相对较低。对于具有与非改善相关的基线特征的患者,应考虑替代训练方案。