Tesar G E, Rosenbaum J F, Pollack M H, Otto M W, Sachs G S, Herman J B, Cohen L S, Spier S A
Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991 Feb;52(2):69-76.
To test the reported antipanic efficacy of clonazepam, the authors randomized 72 subjects with panic disorder to 6 weeks of treatment with either alprazolam, clonazepam, or placebo. Endpoint analysis demonstrated a significant beneficial effect of both active treatments, but not placebo treatment, on the frequency of panic attacks, overall phobia ratings, and the extent of disability. Comparison of the two active treatments revealed no significant differences and no consistent tendency for one agent to be favored over another, although power to detect small differences was limited. Sedation and ataxia were the most common side effects reported, but these effects were mild and transient and did not interfere with treatment outcome. The results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial are consistent with previous reports of clonazepam's antipanic efficacy.
为了检验所报道的氯硝西泮的抗惊恐疗效,作者将72名惊恐障碍患者随机分为三组,分别接受为期6周的阿普唑仑、氯硝西泮或安慰剂治疗。终点分析表明,两种活性药物治疗对惊恐发作频率、总体恐惧评分和残疾程度均有显著的有益效果,而安慰剂治疗则无此效果。两种活性药物治疗的比较显示,尽管检测微小差异的效能有限,但两者之间无显著差异,也没有一种药物比另一种药物更受青睐的一致趋势。镇静和共济失调是报告中最常见的副作用,但这些影响轻微且短暂,不影响治疗结果。这项双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果与先前关于氯硝西泮抗惊恐疗效的报道一致。