Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 463-707, Korea.
Eur Spine J. 2010 Apr;19(4):575-82. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1216-1. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values of laboratory indicators of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) and a potential cure if the microorganism cannot be identified. Forty-five consecutive patients with PVO were enrolled. Antibiotic therapy with or without surgery was performed according to microorganism. In the negative-culture (NC) group, cefazolin was administered in cases of hematogenous PVO, and vancomycin was administered in cases of postoperative or procedure-related PVO. The clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings were followed up with regard to an appropriate response to antimicrobial therapy. Nine patients were treated with antibiotics alone. We were able to identify the microorganism in 34 cases (75.6%). Ten cases in NC group were cured without recurrence, but one was not. Identification of the microorganisms did not have any significant influence on the treatment outcome, duration of antibiotic administration or normalization of laboratory profiles. For erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values over 55 mm/h and C-reactive protein (CRP) values of 2.75 mg/dL at fourth week after antibiotic administration by means of ROC curve analysis, we expect significantly high rates of treatment failure by Pearson chi(2) test (chi(2) = 4.344, Odds ratio = 5.15, p = 0.037, 95% CI 1.004-26.597). Even in patients with negative culture findings, it is expected that a good outcome will be achieved by the administration of cefazolin or vancomycin for about 6 weeks. It is concluded that antibiotics selected according to the etiological setting can be initiated without the need to start empirical antibiotics. In every instance at fourth week after the initiation of antibiotic therapy, the values of CRP and ESR can provide meaningful information regarding whether clinicians need to reevaluate the effectiveness of antibiotics by performing follow-up imaging studies and monitoring the patient's clinical manifestations.
本研究旨在确定化脓性脊柱骨髓炎(PVO)的实验室指标的预测值,如果无法确定微生物,则确定潜在的治愈方法。共纳入 45 例连续的 PVO 患者。根据微生物选择抗生素治疗或联合手术治疗。在阴性培养(NC)组中,血源性病原体引起的 PVO 使用头孢唑林,术后或与手术相关的 PVO 使用万古霉素。根据抗菌治疗的适当反应,对临床、实验室和影像学发现进行随访。9 例患者单独使用抗生素治疗。我们能够在 34 例(75.6%)病例中鉴定微生物。NC 组中有 10 例治愈且无复发,但有 1 例未治愈。微生物鉴定对治疗结果、抗生素使用时间或实验室参数的正常化没有任何显著影响。通过 ROC 曲线分析,对于抗生素治疗后第 4 周红细胞沉降率(ESR)>55mm/h 和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)>2.75mg/dL 的患者,我们预计通过皮尔逊卡方检验(chi(2) = 4.344,优势比= 5.15,p = 0.037,95%CI 1.004-26.597)出现治疗失败的概率会显著升高。即使在阴性培养结果的患者中,头孢唑林或万古霉素治疗约 6 周也有望取得良好的疗效。结论是,可以根据病因学选择抗生素进行治疗,而无需开始经验性抗生素治疗。在抗生素治疗开始后的第 4 周,CRP 和 ESR 的值可以为临床医生提供有意义的信息,即是否需要通过进行随访影像学研究和监测患者的临床表现来重新评估抗生素的有效性。