Suppr超能文献

淋巴结侵犯机制是否影响胰腺导管腺癌患者的生存?

Does the mechanism of lymph node invasion affect survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Feb;14(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1096-z. Epub 2009 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastases are prognostically significant in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Little is known about the significance of direct lymph node invasion.

AIM

The aim of this study is to find out whether direct lymph node invasion has the same prognostic significance as regional nodal metastases.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients resected between 1/1/1993 and 7/31/2008. "Direct" was defined as tumor extension into adjacent nodes, and "regional" was defined as metastases to peripancreatic nodes.

RESULTS

Overall, 517 patients underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma, of whom 89 had one positive node (direct 26, regional 63), and 79 had two positive nodes (direct 6, regional 68, both 5). Overall, survival of node-negative patients was improved compared to patients with positive nodes (N0 30.8 months vs. N1 16.4 months; p < 0.001). There was no survival difference for patients with direct vs. regional lymph node invasion (p = 0.67). Patients with one positive node had a better overall survival compared to patients with >/=2 positive nodes (22.3 and 15 months, respectively; p < 0.001). The lymph node ratio (+LN/total LN) was prognostically significant after Cox regression (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated direct invasion occurs in 20% of patients with one to two positive nodes. Node involvement by metastasis or by direct invasion are equally significant predictors of reduced survival. Both the number of positive nodes and the lymph node ratio are significant prognostic factors.

摘要

背景

淋巴结转移对胰腺导管腺癌具有预后意义。直接淋巴结侵犯的意义知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在探讨直接淋巴结侵犯是否与区域淋巴结转移具有相同的预后意义。

方法

回顾性分析 1993 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 7 月 31 日期间接受手术切除的患者。“直接”定义为肿瘤向邻近淋巴结延伸,“区域”定义为转移至胰周淋巴结。

结果

共有 517 例患者因腺癌行胰腺切除术,其中 89 例有 1 个阳性淋巴结(直接侵犯 26 例,区域转移 63 例),79 例有 2 个阳性淋巴结(直接侵犯 6 例,区域转移 68 例,两者均有 5 例)。总的来说,淋巴结阴性患者的生存情况优于阳性患者(N0 30.8 个月 vs. N1 16.4 个月;p < 0.001)。直接侵犯与区域淋巴结侵犯的患者生存无差异(p = 0.67)。1 个阳性淋巴结的患者总生存情况优于≥2 个阳性淋巴结的患者(分别为 22.3 个月和 15 个月;p < 0.001)。Cox 回归分析显示,淋巴结阳性比例(+LN/总 LN)具有预后意义(p < 0.001)。

结论

在 1 至 2 个阳性淋巴结的患者中,有 20%发生孤立性直接侵犯。转移或直接侵犯累及淋巴结同样是生存时间缩短的显著预测因素。阳性淋巴结的数量和淋巴结阳性比例都是显著的预后因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An Asian institution's experience.切除的胰腺腺癌:亚洲机构的经验。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Oct;4(5):e1393. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1393. Epub 2021 May 3.

本文引用的文献

5
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors.胰腺腺癌:真正的5年生存者。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Apr;12(4):701-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0384-8. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
9
1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.1423例胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术:单中心经验
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Nov;10(9):1199-210; discussion 1210-1. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.08.018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验