Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, RY800-B200, Merck Research Laboratories, 126 E. Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ 07065-0900, USA.
Drug Metab Rev. 2010 May;42(2):225-49. doi: 10.3109/03602530903401658.
Retrospective studies indicate that many drugs that cause clinical adverse reactions, such as hepatotoxicity, undergo metabolic bioactivation, resulting in the formation of electrophilic intermediates capable of covalently modifying biological macromolecules. A logical extension of these findings is a working hypothesis that compounds with reduced levels of bioactivation should be inherently safer drug molecules and thus have a greater likelihood of success in drug development. Whereas some research-based pharmaceutical companies have adopted a strategy of addressing metabolic bioactivation early in drug discovery, much skepticism remains on whether such an approach would enable the industry to reach the desired objectives. The debate is centered on the question of whether there is a quantitative correlation between bioactivation and the severity of drug-treatment-related toxicity, and whether covalent protein modification represents only one of several possible mechanisms underlying observed tissue injury. This communication is intended to briefly review the current understanding of drug-induced hepatotoxicity and to discuss the controversy and future directions with respect to the effort of minimizing the probability of clinical adverse reactions.
回顾性研究表明,许多引起临床不良反应的药物,如肝毒性,经历代谢生物活化,形成能够使生物大分子共价修饰的亲电子中间体。这些发现的一个合乎逻辑的推论是一个工作假设,即生物活化水平降低的化合物应该是内在更安全的药物分子,因此在药物开发中更有可能成功。虽然一些基于研究的制药公司已经在药物发现的早期采用了解决代谢生物活化的策略,但对于这种方法是否能够使该行业达到预期目标,仍然存在很大的怀疑。争论的焦点是生物活化与药物治疗相关毒性的严重程度之间是否存在定量相关性,以及共价蛋白质修饰是否仅代表观察到的组织损伤的几种可能机制之一。本通讯旨在简要回顾药物诱导的肝毒性的当前认识,并讨论关于最小化临床不良反应概率的努力的争议和未来方向。